Abstract
Background Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) used to limit SARS-CoV-2 transmission vary in their feasibility, appropriateness and effectiveness in different contexts. In Bangladesh a national lockdown implemented in March 2020 exacerbated poverty and was untenable long-term, and a resurgence in 2021 warranted renewed NPIs.
Methods We developed an SEIR model for Dhaka District, parameterised from literature values and calibrated to data from Bangladesh. We discussed scenarios and parameterisations with policymakers with the aid of an interactive app. These discussions guided modelling of lockdown and two post-lockdown measures considered feasible to deliver; symptoms-based household quarantining and compulsory mask-wearing. We examined how testing capacity affects case detection, and compared NPI scenarios on deaths, hospitalisations relative to capacity, working days lost, and cost-effectiveness.
Results Lockdowns alone were predicted to delay the first epidemic peak but could not prevent overwhelming of the health service and were costly in lost working days. Impacts of post-lockdown interventions depended heavily on compliance. Assuming 80% compliance, symptoms-based household quarantining alone could not prevent hospitalisations exceeding capacity, whilst mask-wearing prevented overwhelming health services and was cost-effective given masks of high filtration efficiency. Combining masks with quarantine increased their impact. Even at maximum testing capacity, confirmed cases far underestimate total cases. Recalibration to surging cases in 2021 suggests potential for another wave later in 2021, dependent on uncertainties in case reporting and immunity.
Conclusions Masks and symptoms-based household quarantining synergistically prevent transmission, and are cost-effective in Bangladesh. Our interactive app was valuable in supporting decision-making, with mask-wearing being mandated early, and community teams being deployed to support quarantining across Dhaka. These measures likely contributed to averting the worst public health impacts, but delivering an effective response at scale has been challenging. Messaging to increase compliance with mask-wearing and quarantine is needed to reduce the risk and impacts from another wave.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded work by FAO and UoG (INV-022851), and UoG reports funding from Wellcome (207569/Z/17/Z).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
No IRB and/or ethics committee approvals were required.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data and code can be accessed via out Github repository (https://github.com/boydorr/BGD_Covid-19/BGD_NPI_model). The interactive app is available at http://boydorr.gla.ac.uk/BGD_Covid-19/CEEDS/.