ABSTRACT
Objective Our objective was to assess the level of COVID-19 preparedness of emergency departments (EDs) in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) through the views of emergency medicine specialists working in district health boards around the country. Given the limited experience NZ hospitals have had with SARS-CoV-2, a comparison of current local practice with recent literature from other countries identifying known weaknesses may help prevent future healthcare worker infections in NZ.
Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of NZ emergency specialists in November 2020 to evaluate preparedness of engineering, administrative policy, and personal protective equipment (PPE) use.
Results A total of 137 surveys were completed (32% response rate). More than 10% of emergency specialists surveyed reported no access to negative pressure rooms. N95 fit testing had not been performed in 15 (12%) of respondents. Most specialists (77%) work in EDs that cohort COVID-19 patients, about one-third (34%) do not use spotters during PPE doffing, and most (87%) do not have required space for physical distancing in non-patient areas. Initial PPE training, simulations and segregating patients were widespread but appear to be waning with persistent low SARS-CoV-2 prevalence. PPE shortages were not identified in NZ EDs, yet 13% of consultants do not plan to use respirators during aerosol generating procedures on COVID-19 patients. Available treatments including non-invasive ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula were common.
Conclusions New Zealand emergency specialists identified significant gaps in COVID-19 preparedness, and they have a unique opportunity to translate lessons from other locations into local action. These data provide insight into weaknesses in hospital engineering, policy, and PPE practice in advance of future SARS-CoV-2 endemic transmission.
Strengths and limitations of this study
Survey responses specifically identified existing breakdowns in engineering, administrative policy and personal protective equipment in New Zealand emergency departments, potentially increasing healthcare worker nosocomial infection risk upon reintroduction of SARS-CoV-2
Survey included emergency specialists from all 20 of New Zealand’s district health boards but the electronic convenience sample may not be representative of all ED consultants in NZ
Some survey questions asked respondents to recall experiences or project how they would practice if they were caring for a COVID-19 patient and those motivated to respond may feel they have more or less access to protective policies and equipment than non-respondents
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
1) A waiver of ethical approval was received from Health and Disability Ethics Committee from the New Zealand Ministry of Health Courtney Parnell Administrator Health and Disability Ethics Committees hdecs@moh.govt.nz 2)This work needs neither ethical approval nor locality assessment. Dr Michael Roberts Chief Medical Officer Northland District Health Board
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
michaelhowardmd{at}gmail.com
charlotte.chambers{at}asms.org.nz
nicholas.mohr{at}iowa.edu
Reformatting of Tables and Figures. Editing length through condensed Results and Discussion
Data Availability
The Survey in PDF format will be attached as supplementary material online. Excel spreadsheet of results will be made available as supplementary material. There are unpublished concurrent studies using this data set at present.
