ABSTRACT
Clinical research in autism has recently witnessed promising digital phenotyping results, mainly focused on single feature extraction, such as gaze, head turn on name-calling or visual tracking of the moving object. The main drawback of these studies is the focus on relatively isolated behaviors elicited by largely controlled prompts. We recognize that while the diagnosis process understands the indexing of the specific behaviors, ASD also comes with broad impairments that often transcend single behavioral acts. For instance, the atypical nonverbal behaviors manifest through global patterns of atypical postures and movements, fewer gestures used and often decoupled from visual contact, facial affect, speech. Here, we tested the hypothesis that a deep neural network trained on the non-verbal aspects of social interaction can effectively differentiate between children with ASD and their typically developing peers. Our model achieves an accuracy of 80.9% (F1 score: 0.818; precision: 0.784; recall: 0.854) with the prediction probability positively correlated to the overall level of symptoms of autism in social affect and repetitive and restricted behaviors domain. Provided the non-invasive and affordable nature of computer vision, our approach carries reasonable promises that a reliable machine-learning-based ASD screening may become a reality not too far in the future.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding for this study was provided by the National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) Synapsy, financed by the swiss National Science Foundation (SNF, Grant Number: 51NF40_185897), by SNF grants to M.S. (#163859 and #190084), the UNIGE COINF2018 equipment grant, by the SDG Solution Space (https://www.fablabs.io/labs/sdgsolutionspace and by the Fondation Pole Autisme (https://www.pole-autisme.ch).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The current study and protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the Geneva University, Switzerland. The methods used in the present study were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations of Geneva University. For all children included in this study, informed written consent was obtained from a parent and/or legal guardian.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Upon publication in a peer-review journal, data can be obtained upon reasonable request
