Abstract
Purpose Image fusion strategies of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and coronary CT angiography (CCTA) have shown increased diagnostic power. However, their clinical feasibility is hindered by the lack of efficient algorithms for the extraction of cardiac anatomy from CCTA datasets. The aim of this work was to validate our previously published algorithm for automated cardiac segmentation of CCTAs in a larger cohort of subjects while testing its application in clinical settings.
Methods Three borders were automatically and manually extracted on sixty-three clinical CCTAs: left and right endocardia (LV, RV) and the biventricular epicardium (EPI). Impact of image resolutions and inter-operator variability on accuracy and robustness of automated processing were evaluated. Automated algorithm accuracy was assessed with the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and the surface-to-surface distance metric. Relevant quantities were compared for automated versus manual segmentations: LV and RV volumes, myocardial mass and LV myocardial mass.
Results Lower resolution images offered an acceptable trade-off for accuracy and processing time (45 sec). DSC for LV, RV, EPI borders were 0.88, 0.80 and 0.89. Automated versus manual correlation coefficients for LV and RV vol, myo and LV mass were 0.96, 0.73, 0.84 and 0.67 with inter-operator agreement > 0.93 for three variables. Consistent and improved results were evidenced at higher resolutions.
Conclusion Our algorithms allowed efficient automated cardiac segmentation from CT imagery with minimal user intervention, clinically acceptable times and accuracy. The reported results show promise for its use in a clinical environment, specifically in the context of image fusion.
Competing Interest Statement
Conflict of Interest Some of the authors (EVG, RDF) receive royalties from the sale of the Emory Cardiac Toolbox and have equity positions with Syntermed, Inc. The terms of these arrangements have been reviewed and approved by Emory University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. The remaining authors did not report any conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant R01 HL143350 (PI: EV Garcia). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The CCTA image acquisition was originally performed after review and approval by Emory University Institutional Review Board (USA), the Institutional Review Board of the University Hospital Val D Hebron (Spain) and the Institutional Review Board of the Rambam Medical Hospital (Israel). Written informed consent was obtained from each patient in accordance with clinical guidelines on human research. The current work retrospectively analyzes the previously collected images under a novel review and approval of the Emory University Institutional Review Board.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Patients imaging datasets were selected from a database of clinical CCTAs available in the Nuclear Cardiology Laboratory at Emory University. The database was created with images acquired at different clinical and research centers as a result of previous collaborations from 2005 and 2016.
