Abstract
A population pharmacokinetic (PK) study with 363 subjects was performed using real-world data extracted from electronic heath records (EHRs) to estimate the tacrolimus population PK profile. As population PK studies for oral medications performed using EHR data often assume a regular dosing schedule as prescribed without incorporating exact dosing time, we assessed the sensitivity of the PK parameter estimates to assumptions about dose timing using last-dose times extracted by our own natural language processing system, medExtractR. We also investigated the sensitivity of estimations to absorption rate constants that are often fixed at a published value in tacrolimus population PK analysis. There was no appreciable difference in parameters estimates with vs. without last-dose time incorporated in the data and our sensitivity analysis revealed little difference between parameters estimated assuming a range of absorption rate constants. We also conducted simulation studies to investigate how drug PK profiles and experimental designs such as concentration measurements affects sensitivity to incorrect assumptions about dose timing and absorption rates. Our findings suggest that drugs with a slower elimination rate (or a longer half-life) are less sensitive to dose timing errors and that experimental designs which only allow for trough blood concentrations are usually insensitive to deviation in absorption rate.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work is supported by NIH/NIGMS (R01-GM124109).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Vanderbilt Institutional Review Board.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is not publicly available.