ABSTRACT
Life in urban areas is associated with adverse human health effects, including risks of developing cognitive problems and mental health issues. Many epidemiological studies have established associations between urban nature, cognitive development and mental health, but why specifically we receive these health benefits remains unclear, especially in children. Here, we used longitudinal data in a cohort of 3,568 children aged 9 to 15 years at 31 schools across London to develop a model and examine the associations between natural habitat type, and children’s cognitive development and mental health. We show that, after adjusting for other environmental, demographic and socioeconomic variables, higher daily exposure rates to natural habitat and particularly woodland were associated with enhanced cognitive development and mental health from late childhood to early adolescence. Our results suggest that optimising ecosystem services linked to cognitive development and mental health benefits should prioritise the type of natural habitat for sustainable urban planning decisions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study is supported by funding of the London Natural Environment Research Council Doctoral Training Program (NE/L002485/1), the MRC Centre for Environment and Health (MR/L01341X/1) based at Imperial College London and the NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in the Health Impact of Environmental Hazards, based at King's College London and Imperial College London, in partnership with Public Health England (PHE) (HPRU-2012-10141). SCAMP is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Program (PRP) (Secondary School Cohort Study of Mobile Phone Use and Neurocognitive and Behavioural Outcomes/091/0212) via the Research Initiative on Health and Mobile Telecommunications, a partnership between public funders and the mobile phone industry. An extension to SCAMP is funded by NIHR PRP. The funders of the study had no role in the design or conduct of the study nor the reporting of the SCAMP study results. M.B.T. chair and the work in this paper is supported in part by a donation from Marit Mohn to Imperial College London to support Population Child Health. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, DHSC, PHE or any other funder.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All parents or guardians signed the informed consent and the study was approved (REC reference: 14/NW/0347) by the Health Research Authority NKES Committee North West - Haydock.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Study population and environmental exposure data around each child's home and school are not publicly available for data protection issues. To request access to the data, contact M. B. Toledano at m.toledano@imperial.ac.uk. Environmental data that are the basis for our environmental exposure data are available at github.com/MikaelMaes/HumanExposure.git. This environmental data are based on publicly available sources. Sentinel-2 satellite data are available using Google Earth Engine at earthengine.google.com. Buildings, surface water and tidal water data from the OS Open Map are available at ordnancesurvey.co.uk. LiDAR data from the Environment Agency are available at data.gov.uk. Air pollution estimates using the London Atmospheric Emissions Inventory 2016 from the Greater London Authority and Transport for London are available at data.london.gov.uk. The full model outputs that support the findings of this study are available in the Supplementary Information.
