Abstract
Background We previously created the PREDIGT Score as an algorithm to predict the incidence of Parkinson disease. The model rests on a hypothesis-driven formula, [PR=(E+D+I)xGxT], that uses numerical values for five categories known to modulate Parkinson’s risk (PR): environmental exposure (E); DNA variants (D); evidence of gene-environment interactions (I); gender (G); and time (T). Notably, the formula does not rely on motor examination results.
Methods To evaluate the PREDIGT Score, we tested it in two established case-control cohorts: ‘De Novo Parkinson Study’ (DeNoPa) and ‘Parkinson’s Progression Marker Initiative’ (PPMI). Using baseline data from 589 patients and 309 controls enrolled in the DeNoPa and PPMI cohorts, we evaluated the PREDIGT Score’s discriminative performance in distinguishing Parkinson’s patients from healthy controls by area-under-the-curve (AUC) analyses.
Findings When examining cohorts separately and using all available variables in each cohort to calculate the PREDIGT Score, AUCs were 0.83 (95% CI 0.77-0.89) for DeNoPa and 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.9) for PPMI, respectively, in distinguishing Parkinson disease patients from healthy individuals. When combining DeNoPa and PPMI data sets by using eleven variables that had been collected in both cohorts, the PREDIGT Score discriminated patients from controls with an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI 0.81-0.87). The mean score of Parkinson disease patients was significantly higher than that of control individuals at 108.48 (+52.08) and 47.33 (+34.1), respectively (p < 0.0001).
Interpretation Our results demonstrate a robust performance of the original PREDIGT Score in distinguishing patients diagnosed with Parkinson disease from neurologically healthy subjects without reliance on motor examination data. In future efforts, the predictive performance of the algorithm will be studied in longitudinal cohorts of at-risk persons.
Funding Parkinson Canada, Michael J. Fox Foundation, Department of Medicine (The Ottawa Hospital), Uttra & Subash Bhargava Family, Paracelsus-Elena-Klinik Kassel, Parkinson Fond Deutschland, and Deutsche Parkinson Vereinigung.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by funding from Parkinson Canada (to T.M., D. M., M.G.S; 2018; to J.L.; 2019-2021), Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research (to T.M., D. M., M.G.S), Department of Medicine (T.M., T.R., D.M., M.G.S.), The Ottawa Hospital Foundation (Borealis Foundation to J.L.) and the Uttra & Subash Bhargava Family (M.G.S.), the Paracelsus-Elena-Klinik Kassel, Parkinson Fonds Deutschland, and the Deutsche Parkinson Vereinigung (B.M.; C.T.). PPMI - a public-private partnership - is funded by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research and funding partners [list the full names of all of the PPMI funding partners found at www.ppmi-info.org/fundingpartners]. The funders had no role in the design and execution of the study; the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by local ethics boards at all participating clinical sites within the DeNoPa and PPMI cohorts; analyses of de-identified data were approved by the Regulatory Ethics Board of The Ottawa Hospital (20180010-01H).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
PPMI data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database (www.ppmi-info.org/data). For up-to-date information on the study, visit www.ppmi-info.org. For DeNoPa, please contact the study PI Dr. Brit Mollenhauer regarding data access.
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
