ABSTRACT
Background KRAS is a key oncogenic driver in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Chromatin-remodeling gene SMARCA4 was co-mutated with KRAS in LUAD; however, the impact of SMARCA4 mutations on clinical outcome has not been adequately established. This study sought to shed light on the clinical significance of SMARCA4 mutations in LUAD.
Methods The association of SMARCA4 mutations with survival outcomes was interrogated in 4 independent cohorts totaling 564 patients: KRAS-mutant patients with LUAD who received non-immunotherapy treatment from 1) The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and 2) the MSK-IMPACT Clinical Sequencing (MSK-CT) cohorts; and KRAS-mutant patients with LUAD who received immune checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy treatment from 3) the MSK-IMPACT (MSK-IO) and 4) the Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center (WFBCCC) immunotherapy cohorts.
Results Of the patients receiving non-immunotherapy treatment, in the TCGA cohort (n=155), KRAS-mutant patients harboring SMARCA4 mutations (KS) showed poorer clinical outcome (P=6e-04 for disease-free survival (DFS) and .031 for overall survival (OS), respectively), compared to KRAS-TP53 co-mutant (KP) and KRAS-only mutant (K) patients; in the MSK-CT cohort (n=314), KS patients also exhibited shorter OS than KP (P=.03) or K (P=.022) patients. Of patients receiving immunotherapy, KS patients consistently exhibited the shortest progression-free survival (PFS; P=.0091) in the MSK-IO (n=77), and the shortest PFS (P=.0026) and OS (P=0.0014) in the WFBCCC (n=18) cohorts, respectively.
Conclusions mutations of SMARCA4 represent a genetic factor that lead to adverse clinical outcome in lung adenocarcinoma treated by either non-immunotherapy or immunotherapy.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The work is supported by the Cancer Center Support Grant to the Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center (P30CA012197).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We have followed all the ethical procedures and protocols to anonymise, store and handle the patient level data. This research was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at WFBCCC (IRB00038169).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data and materials within this work are made available in this manuscript or previously published.
ABBREVIATIONS
- LUAD
- Lung adenocarcinoma
- KS
- KRAS-SMARCA4 co-mutant
- KP
- KRAS-TP53 co-mutant
- K
- KRAS-only mutant
- LUSC
- Lung squamous carcinoma
- NSCLC
- Non-small cell lung cancer
- TCGA
- The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)
- MSK-CT
- the MSK-IMPACT Clinical Sequencing cohort
- MSK-IO
- MSK-IMPACT cohort
- WFBCCC
- the Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center
- DCB
- durable clinical benefit