Abstract
Physical distancing measures are intended to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, even though their impact on social contacts and disease transmission remains unclear. Obtaining timely data on social contact patterns can help to assess the impact of such protective measures. We conducted an online opt-in survey based on targeted Facebook advertising campaigns across seven European countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom (UK)) and the United States (US), achieving a sample of 53,708 questionnaires in the period March 13–April 13, 2020. Post-stratification weights were produced to correct for biases. Data on social contact numbers, as well as on protective behaviour and perceived level of threat were collected and used to the expected net reproduction number by week, Rt, with respect to pre-pandemic data. Compared to social contacts reported prior to COVID-19, in mid-April daily social contact numbers had decreased between 49% in Germany and 83% in Italy, ranging from below three contacts per day in France, Spain, and the UK up to four in Germany and the Netherlands. Such reductions were sufficient to bring Rt to one or even below in all countries, except Germany. Evidence from the US and the UK showed that the number of daily social contacts mainly decreased after governments issued the first physical distancing guidelines. Finally, although contact numbers decreased uniformly across age groups, older adults reported the lowest numbers of contacts, indicating higher levels of protection. We provided a comparable set of statistics on social contact patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic for eight high-income countries, disaggregated by week. As these estimates offer a more grounded alternative to the theoretical assumptions often used in epidemiological models, the scientific community could draw on this information for developing more realistic epidemic models of COVID-19.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded through the support of the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, which is part of the Max Planck Society.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics Council of the Max Planck Society, which did not require additional ethics approval for each of the countries included in the study. Participation in this opt-in study was voluntary and open to people who were at least 18 years old and gave their informed consent.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Updated methodology to compute social contact matrices based on new estimates of contact numbers by age group. Updated model for estimating contacts, added variables on health behavior and perceived level of threat. Updated sections on epidemiological analysis (methods and results). Added sensitivity analysis on threshold at 30 contacts per day. Author affiliation updated. Figure 1 revised, based on observed data, rather than on predictions. Figure 2 added based on data on health behavior and perceived level of threat. Figure 3 revised, comparing pre-pandemic estimates by age with those from week 15. Figure 4 revised, based on updated epidemiological analysis.
Data Availability
All the primary data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are currently stored in a secure and protected server at the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, and are not publicly available in order to comply with data protection regulations in Germany, and to preserve the privacy of study participants. Replication data and R/Stata code for all our findings will be made available in the future once the appropriate privacy measures have been implemented to avoid identification of individuals in the microdata.
