Abstract
Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) targeting select genes of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been the main diagnostic tool in the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study was aimed at the estimation of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the first RT-PCR test developed by China CDC in January 2020. The study design is a secondary analysis of published findings on 1014 patients in Wuhan, China, of whom 59.3% tested positive for COVID-19 in RT-PCR tests and 87.6% tested positive in chest CT exams. We utilized previously ignored expert opinions in the form of verbal probability classifications of patients with conflicting test results to estimate the informative prior distribution of the infected proportion. It was then used in a Bayesian version of a previously developed model to reconstruct the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic tests without the need for specifying an inaccurate test as the gold standard. The sensitivity of the RT-PCR diagnostic test was estimated to be 0.707 (95% CI: 0.668, 0.749), while the specificity was 0.851 (95% CI: 0.774, 0.941). Caution is advised in generalizing these findings to other versions of the RT-PCR test that are being used in diverse geographic regions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received for this study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB approval was not necessary because the data arise from a publication.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Previously unused data from a second diagnostic test (CT imaging) done on the same patients were included in the analysis. Fuzzy membership functions were used for verbal probabilities and the analytic method was switched to the Bayesian form of Dawid and Skene model. The resulting estimates of sensitivity and specificity of RT-PCR used in Wuhan in early 2020 were found to be lower than in the previous version.
Data Availability
Published data were used in this study.
