ABSTRACT
Objective We investigated the relational aspects of the “Networks of Care” (NOC) approach to better define their role and highlight their importance. These relational aspects distinguish NOC from other health system strengthening approaches that aim to enhance the quality of MNH care. NOCs include functional and relational aspects, as defined in the WHO NOC for MNH framework, and offer a promising strategy for enhancing maternal and newborn health (MNH) by strengthening care coordination at an operational level.
Methods We conducted a cross-disciplinary (healthcare, business, military, aviation, education) scoping review of 90 papers and consulted with key stakeholders to identify and synthesize insights about relational aspects and the associated barriers and facilitators for implementation. We then used the literature review findings and stakeholder feedback to define the relational aspects and revise the Networks of Care Operational framework.
Results The revised framework highlights teamwork with its attributes—trust, mutual respect, shared goals, shared values, and psychological safety and behaviors - leadership, shared decision making, situation monitoring and communication. Organizational enablers underlie a NOC to mitigate barriers and strengthen facilitators to teamwork, which include conflict management, complexity of targets, systemic challenges, social ties, formalization of NOC, and roles like boundary spanners. The study identified relational coordination theory as the basis for refining the NOC operational framework.
Conclusion The resulting framework centers relational coordination including teamwork supported by organizational enablers, in enhancing care coordination between health workers, system administrators, and other users and non-health actors in the network. By targeting relational elements in intervention design and evaluation, the revised Operational NOC Framework for MNH may be valuable in strengthening NOC effectiveness and driving quality improvements leading to improved MNH outcomes, and resilient health systems.
INTRODUCTION
Despite progress made in reducing maternal and newborn mortality rates globally over the past 30 years, the rates have stagnated since 2015 (1). Access to adequate maternal and newborn health services remains unequal across countries, with sub-Saharan Africa showing the least progress. We are far from achieving the maternal and perinatal SDG goals for 2030, and urgent action is needed (2). While skilled birth attendance is widely available across many countries, most LMICs continue to lack sufficient numbers of health care workers, and maldistribution of healthcare workers is a near universal challenge. This, also with inadequate advanced and referral health services in low-resource settings, mean that improving the coordination of care across various service delivery points and providers, from community-based services to referral centers, is necessary. Efficient coordination of healthcare services involves both the institutional pillars within the healthcare system and the human factors and relational processes that facilitate the delivery of effective, timely, and high-quality care. Unfortunately, insufficient understanding of how MNH services are coordinated through these relational processes across and within multiple service points along the continuum of care has resulted in missed opportunities to improve services, especially in resource-constrained settings.
The Networks of Care (NOCs) approach for maternal and newborn health has become an increasingly important concept in global health. The World Health Organization (WHO) and its collaborators define NOC as “collections of public and/or private health facilities and health workers deliberately interconnected to promote multidisciplinary teamwork and collaborative learning to provide comprehensive, equitable, respectful, person-centered care from home/community to primary through to tertiary levels” (3) NOCs or “purposefully interconnected service delivery touch points” are characterized by coordination across the multiple touchpoints and operational levels of care for mothers and newborns (4). Beginning in 2019, the World Health Organization and others developed a framework to describe the NOC concept as an alternate systems approach to improve maternal and newborn health and strengthen primary healthcare services in low- and middle-income countries where the global burden of maternal and newborn mortality remains very high(3). This multi-partner effort involved WHO, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, Jhpiego, and others who have experience with integrated maternal and newborn health programs (5).
While the idea of coordination of services is not new, the NOC approach differentiates itself from conventional service delivery models by emphasizing the “relational” aspects of coordination and recognizing their role in addition to the structural aspects of the healthcare system. These “relational” aspects refer to the often overlooked “soft skills,” that are the human factors or interpersonal and social interactions and processes which drive organizational function. Unfortunately, these relational aspects, generally identified as communication and collaboration, are often assumed to be intact and yet are poorly defined, hindered by ingrained hierarchies, gender, cultural, or other structural barriers. Ultimately, they tend to be neglected but are critical potential levers for improving the effective delivery of healthcare services, including respectful maternity care and patient-focused care. Literature from high-income countries shows that interpersonal, inter-organizational, and intra-organizational relationships are crucial in improving patient care and outcomes (6–8). Several case studies from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Madagascar, Nepal, Nigeria, the Philippines, and Tanzania, studied the elements of NOCs for Maternal and Neonatal Health. These studies highlighted the role of intentional collaboration and communication in establishing and coordinating functional referral systems, promoting community engagement with healthcare facilities, and strengthening service delivery systems. These relational aspects of NOCs were also critical in adapting to challenging or changing conditions toward improving outcomes. The case studies further highlighted the importance of building trust and linkages between healthcare providers at different levels of the health system (9–13).
The original NOC operational framework is theoretical and may be challenging to apply at country and subnational levels for health systems looking to adopt the NOC approach (14). Therefore, there is a need for a more granular understanding of the relational elements of the NOC model framework and its application, particularly for low—and middle-income countries (4,15). By systematically reviewing and understanding relational aspects, we can better define and identify how to apply the NOC approach, measure and act on the relational aspects, and improve MNH service delivery using the NOC approach.
Several systematic reviews have identified key characteristics underlying effective coordination, cooperation, and collaboration. both intra- and inter - organizationally, in healthcare and non-healthcare settings (16–21). Our work builds on these prior reviews, which focused primarily on high-income settings, to synthesize and articulate relational elements that would be applicable in NOCs in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs). Thus, this study aims to advance the NOC approach by defining the relational aspects of NOC and their interconnection to other components to inform a revised Operational NOC Framework MNH in LMICs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We used a three-part process: 1) a scoping review of both the published and grey literature, utilizing database searches, reviews of relevant program reports, citations shared by experts, and citations in referenced papers, 2) stakeholder consultations, and 3) development and iteration of a revised framework.
1) Scoping review
We conducted a scoping literature review of relational elements and definitions of these elements in relation to organizational networks. Given the nascent literature on networks of care in global health, we also searched other sectors, including business, psychology, sociology, organizational behavior, military, and aviation, in addition to healthcare. We searched for literature exploring the elements or factors associated with improved performance in intra-organizational and inter-organizational collaborations, partnerships, or networks. We searched for all available literature and did not apply limits to the date or geography. We searched – Pubmed, and Scopus. We consulted public health and business experts at the onset and reviewed some preliminary literature referred to us. We used their insights to refine the search strategy and search terms. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute three-step strategy (Aromataris & Munn, 2020), we initially searched the topic ‘Networks of care’ in Pubmed. Reviewing the common words we identified from titles and abstracts of search results, we generated a list of keywords to refine the search strategy. Applying these keywords, which included inter-organizational, intra-organizational, collaboration, relational coordination, networks, maternal healthcare, teamwork, facilitators, enablers, and barriers, we conducted a more detailed search in the databases. Finally, we reviewed the reference lists and “cited by” articles of the full-text reviewed papers to identify additional papers missing from our search strategy to be included in the study. The search strategy (from Pubmed) was: ("Inter-professional" OR "Interdisciplinary" OR "Inter-organizational collaboration" OR "Intra-organizational collaboration" OR "Inter-organizational relationships" OR Teamwork OR "Effective teamwork" OR "Organizational effectiveness" OR organizational efficiency OR "Relational coordination") AND ( "Network functionality" OR "Network effectiveness" OR "Network relations" OR networks) AND ("health care" OR healthcare OR maternal health services OR "Healthcare organizations" OR organizations OR aviation OR military OR business OR industry) AND (facilitators OR enablers OR barriers).
We excluded systematic reviews from this search but used them to ensure we accessed all relevant literature. Through stakeholder consultations and expert recommendations, we identified additional program reports and grey literature for inclusion.
We conducted an initial title screen of the search outputs, followed by abstract and full article screens. In reviewing the abstracts, we excluded articles that had no direct link with the objectives and scope of the literature review, articles that were study protocols to evaluate organizational relationships or collaboration, and articles that focused on training or education of students for inter and intra-organizational collaboration. We did not include papers that explored relationships between providers and patients. We included all studies published prior to September 2023.
Data Extraction
We extracted the data from the retrieved papers into a standardized Excel template. Extracted information including title, authors, doi or website, year of publication, abstract, a summary of the article’s contents, and the relational elements identified. We then synthesized the findings based on commonly occurring themes. We conducted a manual analysis along three dimensions that would inform the revised framework: 1) definitions of relational elements in inter/intra-organizational collaborations or networks, 2) facilitators and barriers of relational elements, and 3) envisioning strategies for improving relational elements.
2) Stakeholder consultations
Before conducting the scoping review, we met with colleagues from WHO, USAID, and other stakeholders at the International Maternal Newborn Health Conference in Cape Town in May 2023. Feedback from the stakeholders, a mix of country and global opinion leaders, and policymakers in global health, indicated that conceptually, the concept of a NOC model was clear, but articulating and understanding the relational components and their placement and application in the existing framework was more challenging.
During the summer of 2023, concurrently with the scoping review, our team conducted individual virtual discussions with twenty-one experts specializing in MNH and global health drawn from the WHO-led NOC steering committee and country government officials. They represented a range of organizations and institutions, including the WHO and the World Bank, academic institutions such as Stanford University, bilateral and donor agencies including USAID and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and various Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and country programs like MOMENTUM, Jhpiego, Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), and CHAI. Thirteen of them represented global organizations, and eight were country-based. We also sought input from two business school professors.
The primary objective of these discussions was to gather diverse perspectives on applying the NOC framework in the LMIC context. The discussions followed the same guide with five questions about their perspectives on the relational processes that make NOCs function and what would be most useful for in-country health system managers in LMICs looking to implement an NOC model.
These interviews with key stakeholders were consultative and did not involve the collection, analysis, or reporting of specific data; thus, the work was exempt from human subject (IRB) review.
3) Development of a revised Operational Framework and definitions
Through the scoping review synthesis and the feedback from the MNH experts we consulted, we identified the core relational elements and organizational processes to inform a revised NOC operational framework. The revised framework is conceptualized from an applied perspective that implementers, systems, and policy decision-makers can use to guide interventions and approaches to strengthen NOC. We reviewed existing definitions from a range of sources related to healthcare, and based on expert opinion, we generated definitions that most appropriately describe the relational aspects of the NOC.
RESULTS
Scoping Review
The article selection process is summarized in Figure 1. The search yielded 3,569 unique records drawn from online databases and grey literature. We subsequently excluded 3,453 ineligible records through the title and abstract review and fully reviewed 116 records, which included 3 articles found through reference checks. We then assessed these for eligibility and identified a total of 90 eligible articles that were included in the scoping review.
Article Selection and Screening
Characteristics of the included articles
Among the reviewed articles, 84% focused on high-income or upper middle-income countries, while only 9% focused on low- and middle-income countries. The low-income and lower middle-income countries represented were Ethiopia, Malawi, Ghana, India, the Philippines and Zambia. The United States and Canada accounted for 50% of all articles from high-income countries.
Eighty-nine of the articles were from the healthcare sector. The majority of the studies (69%) used qualitative methods, followed by quantitative (12%), mixed methods (6%). There has been an increase in the number of articles published on this topic over the past decade. The distribution of the articles by year of publication is shown in Figure 2 and the number of articles by country is shown in Figure 3.
Number of articles reviewed by year of publication (N=90).
Number of articles reviewed by country.
Findings of the Scoping Review
a. Relational aspects – Attributes and Behaviors
Almost all of the articles referenced trust, mutual respect, shared goals, and shared values as key attributes of relationships or social interactions that make collaboration possible. Trust-building was often cited as a foundational relational element for ensuring effective coordination of collaboratives. Studies emphasized key characteristics of trust, including that partners and stakeholders have a shared knowledge of each other’s roles and expertise and how they contribute jointly to achieving the shared goals of the collaboration (22–24). Linked to trust, some articles highlighted the roles of conflict and conflict management and other key dynamics related to power and hierarchy in influencing the development of trust between collaborating parties (25–29). While critical in forming and maintaining networks, trust is dynamic and non-linear. In addition, to trust, almost all the articles identified the role of mutual respect among collaborators in fostering collaboration and reducing conflicts, leading to greater trust and better communication and teamwork(30).
Most articles reviewed strongly emphasized shared values and a common goal as key components of collaborative engagements that improve coordination. Several of the studies identified the value of aligning toward a shared vision, such as patient-centered care. Patient-centered goals are useful in creating a value proposition for all stakeholders in the network and reduce interpersonal, interprofessional, inter-organizational and intra-organizational tensions that may arise from differences in priorities (24,31–34). A shared mental model, or having a shared goal and vision, enhances trust building, reduces conflict within the collaboration, and, in turn, drives team effectiveness and satisfaction (35). Having a shared mental model focusing on quality healthcare services and patient health outcomes can improve coordination and overall team effectiveness (36).
Another key attribute frequently identified from the review is psychological safety. This builds on interpersonal trust being developed within a team and fosters teamwork in the coordination of care. Articles linked the facilitatory role of leadership to the development of psychological safety, which creates the enabling environment for conflict resolution, deepening of trust, clarity of roles, and feeling supported to take risks and try new things without fear of failure or blame (29,36–39).
A majority of the studies identified behaviors, such as leadership and communication as essential for enhancing coordination and teamwork both within the same units or organizations, or between organizations(40–46). A leader who fosters collaboration, coordination, and shared decision-making was consistently identified as important to effective teamwork (12,47). Leaders’ committing to a collaborative environment and culture was highlighted as important for care quality and coordination(26,31,37,48–50). A leadership structure that supports shared goals, values and vision, fosters teamwork and has mechanisms for managing conflicts and enhancing psychological safety will promote successful collaboration (27,39,50,51). Some of the articles also highlighted the role of leadership, especially institutional leadership, in driving joint planning and coordination across teams and groups of stakeholders in building relationships (22,49).
Most of the articles highlighted effective communication as a key behavior of both inter- and intra-organizational collaboration. Communication between stakeholders and partners should be frequent, open, consistent and foster joint problem-solving, planning, and relationship building (22,28,38,41,52,53). Several articles also identified the importance of creating avenues for communication including regularly scheduled meetings, huddles, or debriefs to facilitate teamwork and cooperation, as these platforms enable the identification and timely resolution of problems thereby reinforcing and promoting the shared commitment to defined outcomes (28,34,36,54–57).
b. Barriers and facilitators of relational elements
Many articles identified barriers and facilitators that influence the relational elements necessary for optimal collaboration and coordination. These barriers and facilitators are broad and diverse ranging from interpersonal relationships and conflicts; to a poor understanding of, or overly complex goals; to systemic or structural barriers that hinder collaboration. These are presented in greater detail in Table 1.
Networks of Care Publication – Manuscript draft
The nine articles from low-income and lower-middle-income countries were more likely to identify systemic barriers to collaborative relationships and care coordination. The “Networks of Practice” approach implemented in Ghana highlighted key systemic and structural issues, such as weak health system governance, lack of political will, and poor healthcare financing, which may impact the development and sustainability of the relational elements. Although not extensively identified, power dynamics and hierarchies (especially between physicians and other professionals) (26,57,60,68,75) and less identified, gender (78) were additional barriers of note.
c. Strategies to promotteamwork
Some of the studies assessed or described strategies that have been implemented to enhance teamwork and coordination. The majority of these strategies were organizational strategies. Several of the organizational strategies were recurrent across studies and can be grouped into three main categories:1) Role clarity and standardized processes, 2) Performance management systems, and 3) Coordination processes.
Role clarity and standardized policies
Some of the studies described formalized processes for information sharing, planning, and problem-solving around a shared goal. Some studies identified the need to establish clear frameworks to ensure stakeholders are aligned on the shared goal, purpose, and expected outcomes for the collaboration(12,24,29,44,47,79–81). These studies also identified the need to define roles and responsibilities. This includes clear job descriptions and adoption of standardized tools, protocols, checklists and standard operating procedures (SOPs) which can help reduce the variation in service delivery and improve coordination between stakeholders.
Performance Management
Studies described the need for a management framework that defines the mechanisms for collaboration and expectations for all stakeholders, accountability arrangements, and measures to assess whether the collaborative effort is yielding the desired results. Several studies identified decision-making and accountability arrangements as key factors that contribute to the success of collaborative efforts (12,31,32,79,82).
Some studies identified the importance of applying organizational performance tools such as Lean management or Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) to conduct gap analyses and identify solutions to improve care coordination(77). Lean management has been found to positively impact improving teamwork, communication, and coordination among health workers(83,84). Kerrissey et al. expanded on the need for instituting processes for measuring performance, addressing conflict, correcting mistakes in a timely fashion, and standardizing how these performance audits are done (61).
Other strategies identified include setting measurable targets, measuring them, and rewarding performance (18) as well as focusing on the performance of teams instead of individuals (85). Mechanisms to maintain team stability which helps to strengthen social ties and interpersonal relationships were cited as crucial to enhancing the performance of collaborative engagements. This applies to both intra-organizational teams and inter-organizational teams which make up the NOC. Some articles highlighted the importance of having accountability systems that enable the collaborating group to keep track of progress towards set goals. These processes include conducting audits (74), performance measurement of the collaborative and not the individuals or mutual performance monitoring (18,82,85–87).
Coordination
Almost all the studies highlighted three main strategies to enhance coordination. These include: 1) Creating opportunities for physical connections and co-location. These could be through meetings, huddles, and other engagements (44,59,61,64,88,89); 2) Providing information and communication technologies to enhance communication and frequency of communication(90–92); and 3) Identifying and assigning a coordination agent. The individual ensures that processes in place are working and identifies issues that may emerge or need addressing(81,93).
Despite the exclusion of articles specifically describing training approaches, we identified training as a critical component to strengthen relationships among team members, improve collaborative leadership, and enhance coordination. Strategies identified for strengthening teamwork at the relational level include team training, leadership training, and formalized communication tools and training. Some studies identified the role of intentionally strengthening leadership capacity to foster teamwork and build trust and transparency(61). This includes building leadership capacity in teamwork, collaboration, shared decision-making, and network oversight. Studies found that leadership involvement in identifying problems and shared decision-making to identify and implement solutions can strengthen collaborative relationships in healthcare service delivery (82). Mentoring by teamwork specialists provides an effective way to build capacity in teamwork alongside professional skills and competencies.
The need to train staff in both task expertise and teamwork was often highlighted as essential in most articles. According to the research conducted by Wise et al., the effectiveness of a team is not solely dependent on the individuals’ skills and competence to carry out their designated task but also on their ability to coordinate with each other (18,43,76,85). The Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) training is one patient safety training program designed to strengthen teamwork. TeamSTEPPS aims to enhance communication and teamwork in healthcare settings by providing healthcare professionals with the necessary tools and strategies to work collaboratively towards a common goal (94,95).
Revised operational framework and definitions
In the review, we came across popular frameworks that have been used to assess integration, collaboration, and coordination including the network theory (96), and the competing values frameworks(97). However, the Relational Coordination (RC) theory (77,98) stood out among the theories we identified and appears to be the most suited as a basis for the relational elements of NOCs for LMICs.
Effective communication and coordination are crucial for achieving desired outcomes in work that is highly interdependent and time-sensitive, according to the RC theory developed by Joy Hoffer Gittell in the mid-1990s based on an in-depth field study of flight departures in the airline industry(77)( Fig 4). It expanded on previous work done on coordination. The theory of relational coordination proposes that “relationships with shared goals, shared knowledge, and mutual respect are critical to support frequent, timely, accurate, problem-solving communication, and vice versa, enabling stakeholders to effectively coordinate their work across boundaries” (77). Shared goals, mutual respect and enhanced communication were found to be foundational among effective Networks of Care in the 2020 scoping review and case studies,(4) hence the Relational Coordination Theory is in agreement with previous literature about NOC.
Interventions to strengthen Relational Coordination (Source: https://cisr.mit.edu/publication/2022_0501_RelationalEcosystems_SebastianGittell#fn_4)
When RC is applied to healthcare, studies suggest it can lead to improvements in the quality of care, increased provider job satisfaction, patient-reported care continuity, and adaptive learning (6,99–102).
Including the synthesis of the literature review and the feedback from the MNH experts at the global and country levels, we adapted the relational coordination theory to develop a revised Operational NOC Framework for MNH (Fig 5). This revised framework takes an applied perspective, aiming to serve as a guide that implementers, systems, and policy decision-makers can use to establish and strengthen NOCs. The revised framework, building on the original framework, has two main aspects for a functional NOC model – 1) Structure – made up of the WHO health systems building blocks) and 2) Relational Coordination, subdivided into teamwork and organizational enablers.
Revised Operational NOC Framework for MNH
The Revised Operational NOC Framework for MNH
Synthesizing the concepts of teamwork, organizational enablers, and the health system pillars that make NOCs operational and functional, we developed a revised Operational Framework for NOCs emphasizing the relational aspects and how they layer on the structural aspects. Figure 5 illustrates the revised framework we developed. In this framework, Relational Coordination for NOC includes teamwork and organizational enablers within dynamic and iterative processes that encourage adaptive learning and lead to improved performance or outcomes.
After developing the revised framework with some iterations based on stakeholder feedback, we felt it was necessary to modify the NOC definition to reflect better the dynamic processes and mechanisms by which an effective NOC can drive improved outcomes. This includes acknowledging the role of formal and informal relationships and interdisciplinary teams and is proposed as follows:
Networks of care for maternal and newborn health exist on a spectrum from informal or formal collaborations between and within public and private health facilities interconnected to form interdisciplinary teams with structural, organizational, relational and adaptive learning to deliver high quality equitable, respectful person-centered care from household to primary through to tertiary levels.
Defining the Teamwork attributes and behaviors
Our review and consequent operational framework depict teamwork as a dynamic state in which a set of attributes and behaviors are mutually reinforcing. We reviewed existing definitions of the identified attributes and behaviors that comprise teamwork and, through expert opinion and review, generated definitions that most appropriately describe the attributes and behaviors of teamwork in the context of NOC. (Table 2).
Based on the scoping review, we also defined organizational enablers for driving teamwork in the context of relational coordination. Organizational enablers can be subdivided into role clarity and standardized processes, performance management, and coordination. For each of the three organizational enablers, we identified core strategies synthesized from the literature review as listed in Figure 6.
Organizational Enablers to improve teamwork in NOCs
DISCUSSION
This scoping review examined the relational aspects that define high-performing Networks of Care (NOCs) to develop a revised framework for implementing the NOC model for maternal and newborn health in LMICs. Our broad search strategy, guided by expert opinions, captured a wide range of studies. The cross-disciplinary approach, incorporating business, military, and aviation, underscores the widespread recognition that relational processes drive organizational and team performance. We analyzed 90 relevant papers and found that relational aspects of NOCs for MNH are best described through an adaptation of Relational Coordination theory. The revised framework emphasizes teamwork and organizational enablers for both intra- and inter-organizational networks, built on a strong health system together for successful NOCs. NOCs span clinical and administrative dimensions of care coordination and include teams at the frontlines of healthcare delivery, healthcare managers and administrators, and healthcare service users. Striving for Relational Coordination is not limited to clinical actors but also applies to networks that include administrative and community actors at different levels.
While many attributes and behaviors of teamwork are well-known, some aspects emerged as particularly important for LMICs. First, psychological safety as an attribute may be linked to NOC resilience and adaptive learning. This is supported by existing literature identifying psychological safety as important for improving organizational performance (103) and organizational learning(104), which is crucial for NOCs’ adaptive learning feature. Team psychological safety is a function of interpersonal trust and mutual respect, creating a climate that enables people to speak up and question without fear of judgement (104). Second, trust is built by achieving results, so setting realistic short-term goals rather than overambitious targets is vital. LMICs often align with long-term global targets, but short-term success is critical for NOCs. For LMICs to adopt NOCs, strong and realistic performance management systems are essential. Additionally, collaborative leadership with shared decision-making is necessary to ensure effective service coordination and build trust and transparency.
Careful consideration and implementation of organizational enablers is needed. A dedicated coordinator is key to network success. This role is especially valuable in LMICs, where human resources are limited and professional, cultural, and gender boundaries affect service coordination. Health systems adopting the NOC approach should consider creating boundary-spanning roles as a component of coordination to facilitate operations as they introduce Relational Coordination in NOC.
Finally, a functional healthcare system is needed for effective collaboration and coordination. This includes sufficient infrastructure, appropriate staffing ratios, and adequate funding (21). Efforts to maintain team stability are crucial, as staff attrition and frequent redistribution hinder the development of strong interpersonal relationships necessary for building and maintaining trust which is critical for teamwork sustenance.
A previously implemented system-oriented intervention to improve health outcomes for children in Kenyan district hospitals, the Clinical Information Network (CIN) (105), serves as a useful example to illustrate the applicability of our revised framework. If we apply our framework to describe the CIN intervention package, we can identify components that strengthen teamwork attributes, with alignment around specific shared goals; capacity building included teamwork training specifically to build capacity for collective leadership, and mentorship on both clinical skills and teamwork. Audit and performance review without sanctioning fostered the psychological safety needed for continuous learning and adaptation. Organizational enablers included establishing a functional hospital information system for real-time data on performance with regular feedback mechanisms. The project designating a network coordinator to support the process and facilitate collaboration through meetings and reviews(105); And finally, the project addressed the health system pillars by monitoring and providing equipment, supplies and adequate personnel.
After four years of implementation, the lessons from this CIN intervention showed that resourcing remained a significant threat to the sustainability of the complex and adaptive mechanisms required to keep the network functional and sustained. They also noted that improving care outcomes required more than implementation of a package of interventions, it also relied on building “soft skills” among system stakeholders, leaders, with adaptive learning inbuilt within service delivery processes for success(106).
Our NOC framework overlaps with Mintzberg’s concepts of job specialization, behavior formalization through rules and procedures, and liaison devices for encouraging mutual adjustments across units (107). Healthcare delivery systems are complex, operating across various organizations, disciplines, and contexts. Delivering high-quality, patient-centered services requires reliable collaboration within and across these boundaries (20). Relationships are essential in ensuring integrated, coordinated care in these systems. Collaborative engagements in healthcare range from formal to informal and can be potential, developing, or active (53). Our literature review highlighted more intentional approaches to foster coordination. Often, existing informal relationships are built over time out of necessity and from interpersonal connections (44,53,60,91).
A key takeaway is that Relational Coordination in NOCs in LMICs is highly relevant and with the potential to improve healthcare service delivery if properly understood and applied both within and across institutions, including primarily management and administrative teams designed to support MNH care processes. Clear definitions, measurement approaches, and interventions grounded in a NOC operational framework can help accelerate the introduction of effective interventions to improve MNH services through continuous learning and innovation. In addition, although scarcely explored in LMICs, evidence supports the hypothesis that Relational Coordination is associated with improved job satisfaction, lower burnout, higher motivation, and continuous learning. This can lead to higher retention, addressing a major challenge in healthcare in many LMICs (100,108).
Additional research is needed to develop and test validated tools and measures for evaluating these elements in MNH networks in LMICs. While some existing tools measure teamwork and coordination, they are primarily used in high-income countries and within single organizational units (80,109,110).
Maternal and newborn health is a high-reliability field like aviation, military action, or manufacturing, where processes are complex, and mistakes can be fatal (111,112). An ongoing challenge in healthcare systems, particularly in maternal and newborn health, is the influence of power dynamics and gender on relational coordination processes. Traditional roles and hierarchies within the medical team, comprising doctors, nurses, midwives, and allied health professionals, impact trust and the maintenance of relationships. It is important to go deeper into understanding the roles hierarchy, power, and gender play in the relational elements of NOCs in LMICs through further research.
Study Strengths and limitations
Our study describes a comprehensive cross-disciplinary approach to develop a revised NOC Operational framework that emphasizes Relational Coordination. Our study did not explore the creation of relational elements or social processes, nor the theory of change for achieving improved performance, although evidence suggests these aspects are important (20,31,113). Our search was limited to primarily published and grey literature available online, acknowledging the possibility of relevant LMIC studies or case studies not publicly accessible which we may have missed. Given the importance of training as a critical organizational enabler for promoting better collaboration and teamwork, the exclusion of articles that studied teamwork training methods may have limited the extent to which we can understand the role of training in NOC models. Finally, while we have extrapolated data from the review and stakeholder consultations to inform the development of the revised operational framework, the paucity of studies and articles from LMICs means that some of the findings may be skewed to high income contexts and additional research on NOCs, and their relational aspects in LMICs may be required to further refine the operational framework.
CONCLUSION
This study developed a revised operational framework for NOC focusing on Relational Coordination with insights integrated from both healthcare and non-healthcare fields. The resulting NOC framework aims to orient implementers in designing interventions to improve Relational Coordination in maternal and child healthcare services to achieve better health outcomes and build a more resilient workforce. Additional research is needed to develop tools for measuring and evaluating relational coordination in the LMIC context. Of note, power dynamics and gender roles remain significant challenges that are under-explored and less studied in healthcare systems in LMICs, which warrant further inquiry.
Funding acknowledgement
This study was supported by funds from The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Health Evaluation and Applied Research Development (HEARD) Project.
Contributors
OF led the scoping review with feedback on the synthesis and analysis from DW, and SB. DW, AJ and OF conducted the stakeholder consultations with inputs from KK, AM, RC, DM, MV. OF drafted the manuscript with support from DW, SB, NP with feedback on subsequent manuscript drafts by all authors.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the stakeholders who were consulted in the process of conducting the literature review and figuring out the strategy,
References
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
- 6.↵
- 7.
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.↵
- 13.↵
- 14.↵
- 15.↵
- 16.↵
- 17.
- 18.↵
- 19.
- 20.↵
- 21.↵
- 22.↵
- 23.
- 24.↵
- 25.↵
- 26.↵
- 27.↵
- 28.↵
- 29.↵
- 30.↵
- 31.↵
- 32.↵
- 33.
- 34.↵
- 35.↵
- 36.↵
- 37.↵
- 38.↵
- 39.↵
- 40.↵
- 41.↵
- 42.
- 43.↵
- 44.↵
- 45.
- 46.↵
- 47.↵
- 48.↵
- 49.↵
- 50.↵
- 51.↵
- 52.↵
- 53.↵
- 54.↵
- 55.
- 56.
- 57.↵
- 58.
- 59.↵
- 60.↵
- 61.↵
- 62.
- 63.
- 64.↵
- 65.
- 66.
- 67.
- 68.↵
- 69.
- 70.
- 71.
- 72.
- 73.
- 74.↵
- 75.↵
- 76.↵
- 77.↵
- 78.↵
- 79.↵
- 80.↵
- 81.↵
- 82.↵
- 83.↵
- 84.↵
- 85.↵
- 86.
- 87.↵
- 88.↵
- 89.↵
- 90.↵
- 91.↵
- 92.↵
- 93.↵
- 94.↵
- 95.↵
- 96.↵
- 97.↵
- 98.↵
- 99.↵
- 100.↵
- 101.
- 102.↵
- 103.↵
- 104.↵
- 105.↵
- 106.↵
- 107.↵
- 108.↵
- 109.↵
- 110.↵
- 111.↵
- 112.↵
- 113.↵
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos