Abstract
Importance This is the first meta-analysis to investigate risk of death and hospitalization in individuals with comorbidities, specifically during the Omicron era.
Objective To assess the risk of mortality and hospitalization from COVID-19 in individuals with comorbidities in comparison with individuals without comorbidities during the Omicron era.
Data Sources A systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Europe PMC, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, and WHO COVID-19 Database was performed to identify studies published between 1 January 2022 and 13 March 2024.
Study Selection Inclusion criteria were observational studies including people (all ages) with at least 1 of the following comorbidities: cardiovascular/ cerebrovascular disease, chronic lung conditions, diabetes, and obesity. In total, 72 studies were included in the review, of which 68 were meta-analyzed.
Data Extraction and Synthesis Data were extracted by one reviewer and verified by a second. Studies were synthesized quantitively (meta-analysis) using random-effect models. PRISMA guidelines were followed.
Main Outcomes and Measures Evaluated outcomes were the risks of death, hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and any combination of these outcomes. Odds ratios, hazard ratios, and rate ratios were extracted; pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.
Results Minimum numbers of participants per comorbidity across included studies ranged from 328 870 for thrombosis to 13 720 480 for hypertension. Risks of death, hospitalization, and the combined outcome were increased in individuals with cerebrovascular disease, COPD, diabetes, respiratory diseases, heart disease, and heart failure versus those without (pooled RRs ranged from 1.27 [heart disease, hospitalization; 95% CI, 1.17-1.38, P < .001] to 1.78 [heart failure, death: 95% CI, 1.46-2.16, P < .001]). Individuals with diabetes and obesity had increased risk of ICU admission (RR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.04-1.38, P = .0141 and RR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.11-1.57, P = .00158, respectively).
Conclusions During the Omicron era, risk of death and hospitalization from COVID-19 is increased amongst individuals with comorbidities including cerebrovascular/cardiovascular conditions, chronic lung diseases, and diabetes, with the highest risk in those with heart failure. Individuals with diabetes and obesity are at increased risk of ICU admission.
Question What are the risks of severe outcomes from COVID-19 in individuals with comorbidities during the Omicron era?
Findings This systematic review and meta-analysis found increased risk of mortality and hospitalization among individuals with a range of comorbidities, including cerebrovascular/cardiovascular conditions, chronic lung diseases, and diabetes, with the highest risk in those with heart failure, versus those without. Risk of ICU admission was higher in individuals with obesity and diabetes.
Meaning This study identified comorbid populations most at risk of severe outcomes from COVID-19. Targeting these populations with public health measures, such as vaccination, may be beneficial.
Introduction
At an early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, individuals with comorbidities, including diabetes, obesity, respiratory, and cardiovascular diseases were more likely to experience adverse health outcomes caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. 1,2 Such populations may be at increased risk of death and hospitalization in comparison with the general population.1–4
Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants have exhibited milder infections and reduced hospitalization compared with the earlier Delta (B.1.617.2) variant.5–7 Despite this, Omicron (B.1.1.529) was classified as a variant of concern by the World Health Organization (WHO) in November 2021 due to a detrimental change in COVID-19 epidemiology.8 In particular, individuals with pre-existing comorbidities may still be at a higher risk of complications and death from SARS-CoV-2 infection in the current Omicron era than individuals in the general population.9 As SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants evolve, understanding the impact and risk of infection on individuals with comorbidities is crucial for informed treatment and risk mitigation through vaccination or other preventative measures.
To our knowledge, this is the first systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis aimed at assessing the risk of mortality and hospitalization from COVID-19 in individuals with comorbidities, including cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases, chronic lung conditions, diabetes, and obesity, during the Omicron era.
Methods
The SLR protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024501163). This SLR and meta-analysis adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines (PRISMA).
Search Strategy
The following databases were searched: Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Europe PMC (including MedRix and bioRxiv preprints), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, and the WHO COVID-19 Database. Search strategies were structured using terms related to COVID-19 infection, risk, and burden of illness (eMethods).
Eligibility Criteria
Eligible studies included people (all ages) with at least 1 of the following comorbidities: cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease, chronic lung conditions, diabetes, and obesity (eTable 1).
Individuals without the respective comorbidities or the general population were used as the comparator group. Evaluated outcomes were the risks of death, hospitalization (for any reason), intensive care unit (ICU) admission (for any reason), and the combined outcome (any combination of the other outcomes). COVID-19 outcomes were determined by including studies where either all patients had COVID-19 at the start of the study or all deaths and hospitalisations were related to COVID-19 (defined by the studies).
Included studies were observational (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional), published between 1 January 2022 and 13 March 2024, with full texts published in English.
Study Selection, Data Extraction, and Quality Assessment
Identified studies were first assessed at title and abstract level using the Rayyan tool10 by 2 independent reviewers to determine whether inclusion criteria were met, followed by full text screening of all studies found to be eligible. For details of data extraction and quality assessment, see eMethods.
Data Synthesis and Analysis
Qualitative Data Synthesis
All studies included in the review were assessed qualitatively to identify which studies could be combined in a meta-analysis. Comorbidities were grouped as follows, based on recommendations from clinical experts: asthma, cerebrovascular disease, COPD, diabetes, obesity, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), respiratory diseases (excluding asthma and COPD), atrial fibrillation, heart disease, heart failure, hypertension, and thrombosis.
Statistical Analysis
For the primary analyses, pairwise meta-analyses were performed for the risks of death, hospitalization, ICU admission, and the combined outcome for the comorbid populations, using the most adjusted reported outcome estimates. The robustness of the results was assessed using ‘Leave-1-out’,11 ‘Least adjusted’, ‘Only adjusted’, and ‘Excluding studies for population overlap’ sensitivity analyses.
Subgroup analyses were conducted for the ‘Hospitalized’ or ‘General’ populations, which included only individuals who were or were not already hospitalized when they started the study, respectively. Additional subgroup analyses were performed for the ‘>50 years’ population, which included only participants older than 50 years, and the ‘COVID-19-related outcomes only’ population, which included only outcomes explicitly caused by COVID-19 (eMethods).
All statistical analyses were performed in R version 4.1.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) using the meta package. A statistically significant (P < .05) result is referred to as significant thereafter.
Results
In total, 21 937 records were identified through searches and 1 study was identified via reference checking. Following elimination of duplicates, 11 593 remaining studies underwent title and abstract screening of which 3123 studies were assessed in full text screening. A total of 72 studies were selected for inclusion (Figure 1).
Study Characteristics
Study characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The studies were performed in 26 different countries, primarily in Europe (n = 15), China (n = 14), and the USA (n = 13). Most studies were retrospective cohort studies (n = 58), followed by prospective cohort (n = 7), cross-sectional (n = 6), and case-control (n = 1) studies. The ‘Death’, ‘Hospitalization’, ‘ICU admission’, and ‘Combined’ outcomes were reported in 45, 17, 20, and 17 studies, respectively. Most studies did not report Omicron subvariants, but in studies that did, BA.1 was the most common. Other reported subvariants included BA.2, BA.4, BA.5, BF.7, BQ.1, and XXB. eTable 2 provides visualization of the Omicron period in the included studies.
Patient Characteristics
Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 2. Minimum numbers of participants included in analyses for each comorbidity across the included studies are reported in Table 3. Most studies (n = 42) included a ‘Hospitalized Population’, and the rest (n = 30) included ‘General Population’. These populations included individuals who were and were not hospitalized at the start of the study, respectively (Table 2). Diabetes was the most commonly reported comorbidity (n = 50 studies; Table 3) and thrombosis the least commonly reported (n = 4 studies). The majority of studies (>50%) that reported vaccination status included fully vaccinated individuals.
Risk of Bias Assessment
Risk of bias (eTable 3) was assessed in all included studies (n = 72); 56 and 14 were found to be low and medium risk, respectively. Two studies12,13 were found to be high risk and were excluded from the analysis. Two additional studies were excluded from the analysis for not reporting confidence intervals (n = 1)14 and for conflicting interpretation of results within the study (n = 1).15
Meta-Analysis
The risk ratios for death, hospitalization, ICU admission, and combined outcomes among individuals with each comorbidity compared with individuals without comorbidities are shown in Figure 2.
Due to insufficient numbers of studies, meta-analysis was not conducted for the following outcomes and comorbid conditions: ICU admission for asthma, cerebrovascular diseases, COPD, and heart failure; all outcomes except the combined outcome for atrial fibrillation; and all outcomes for PVD and thrombosis (Table 3). These outcomes and comorbidities are excluded from the following meta-analysis but synthesized narratively in the supplement (eResults).
Risk of Death
Individuals with any of the comorbidities meta-analyzed, except asthma and obesity, had a significantly increased risk of death compared with individuals without the respective comorbidity (Figure 2A).
Statistical heterogeneity was considerable in all analyses except among the comorbid populations with heart failure and hypertension, which had substantial heterogeneity (Figure 2A). There was no statistical evidence of publication bias for any of the applicable comorbid populations analyzed, except diabetes (eTable 4).
All sensitivity analyses results had the same direction of effect and degree of significance as the main analysis for the risk of death outcome (eTable 4), indicating robustness of the main analysis results.
Subgroup analyses showed the direction of effect, versus the main analysis, changed for individuals with asthma in the ‘Hospitalized’ and ‘>50 years’ subgroups (ie. these groups with asthma had significantly lower risk of death versus those without asthma) (eTable 5).
Risk of Hospitalization
For all meta-analyzed comorbid conditions, except asthma, individuals with the comorbidity had a significantly increased risk of hospitalization in comparison with individuals without the comorbidity (Figure 2B). Statistical heterogeneity was substantial or considerable for most comorbidities (7/9 applicable comorbid populations; Figure 2B). Publication bias was not assessed in any of the analyses due to the small number of studies, except in the comorbid group with diabetes, where no bias was found (eTable 6).
All sensitivity analyses results had the same direction of effect, and nearly all had the same degree of significance, as the main analyses for the risk of hospitalization outcome (eTable 6), indicating robustness of the main analysis results.
In all subgroup analyses, the direction of effect was the same compared with the main analysis, except individuals with asthma had (non-significantly) lower risk of hospitalization. In nearly all analyses the significance level remained unchanged (eTable 7).
Risk of ICU Admission
While all 5 meta-analyzed comorbidities had increased risk of ICU admission compared with individuals without the comorbidity, this risk was significant in diabetes and obesity only (Figure 2C).
Statistical heterogeneity ranged from not important to considerable across the analyses. Publication bias was not assessed in any of the analyses due to the small number of studies, except in the groups with diabetes and heart disease, in which no bias was found (eTable 8).
Four sensitivity analyses resulted in loss or gain of significance compared with the main analysis for risk of admission to ICU, although the direction of effect (ie, the higher risk of ICU admission) remained the same (eTable 8).
In the ‘COVID-19 related only’ subgroup, the increased risk of ICU admission for comorbid populations with respiratory diseases and heart disease was significant (eTable 9), while this relationship was non-significant in the main analysis.
Risk of the Combined Outcome (Death, Hospitalization or ICU Admission)
For all comorbid conditions, individuals with the comorbidity had significantly increased risk of the combined outcome in comparison with individuals without the comorbidity, except in individuals with asthma and hypertension, where the increased risk was non-significant, and in individuals with obesity, who had lower (but non-significant) risk of the combined outcome in comparison with individuals without obesity (Figure 2D). For details of sensitivity and subgroup analyses for the combined outcome see eResults and eTables 10 and 11.
Individual meta-analyses for each comorbidity, stratified by outcome, can be found in the supplement (eResults).
Discussion
This SLR and meta-analysis examined the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on four outcomes in populations with comorbidities versus those without during the Omicron era. For those with cerebrovascular disease, COPD, diabetes, respiratory diseases (excluding COPD and asthma), heart disease, and heart failure, the pooled relative risks (RR) of death, hospitalization, and a combined outcome were significantly higher, ranging from 1.27 (95% CI, 1.17-1.38) to 1.78 (95% CI, 1.46-2.16). Individuals with hypertension had a significantly increased risk of death and hospitalization, with pooled RRs of 1.20 (95% CI, 1.09-1.32) and 1.48 (95% CI, 1.03-2.14), respectively. Those with obesity and atrial fibrillation demonstrated a significantly increased risk of hospitalization and combined outcomes, respectively, with pooled RRs of 1.39 (95% CI, 1.13-1.70) and 1.59 (95% CI, 1.34-1.90). Additionally, individuals with diabetes and obesity had a significantly increased risk of ICU admission, with pooled RRs of 1.20 (95% CI, 1.04-1.38) and 1.32 (95% CI, 1.11-1.57), respectively.
Of the meta-analyzed comorbid populations, individuals with heart failure had the greatest increase in pooled RRs of death at 1.78 (95% CI, 1.46-2.16), hospitalization at 1.61 (95% CI, 1.36-1.91), and the combined outcome at 1.63 (95% CI, 1.29-2.06). Individuals with asthma had a non-significant increase in risk of any severe outcome, but hospitalized individuals with asthma had a significantly lower pooled RR of death at 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75-0.95) compared with hospitalized individuals without asthma.
Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Individuals with cerebrovascular disease, heart disease, and heart failure had significantly higher risk of all severe outcomes from COVID-19, except ICU admission. This is consistent with several studies conducted prior to and during the Omicron era which reported longer time to recovery16 and greater risk of severe outcomes from COVID-19 in patients with cerebrovascular17–20 and cardiovascular diseases.18–21 In the current study, individuals with hypertension had significantly higher risk of death and hospitalization, but not ICU admission or combined outcomes, consistent with a pre-Omicron meta-analysis,22 although this previous study also reported significantly higher risk of ICU admission. Individuals with atrial fibrillation had significantly higher risk of the combined outcome.
The underlying mechanisms for these outcomes are not well understood, but several have been proposed. For cerebrovascular disease, proinflammatory and hypercoagulable states associated with COVID-19 have been suggested.23,24 For heart disease, possible mechanisms include COVID-19–associated hypercoagulation, direct viral damage to cardiomyocytes, or pneumonia-induced gas exchange obstruction leading to cardiomyocyte injury and apoptosis.2,21 In heart failure and hypertension, viral uptake through increased angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors may increase the risk of severe outcomes.22,25, Direct cardiac injury, increased coagulation abnormalities, thrombotic events, and stress cardiomyopathy increase the risk of severe outcomes in individuals with heart failure or atrial fibrillation.25,26
Respiratory Diseases
Individuals with COPD and other respiratory diseases (including acute respiratory distress syndrome, interstitial lung disease, and chronic lung diseases excluding asthma), had significantly higher risks of death, hospitalization and the combined outcome, consistent with a pre-Omicron meta-analysis on COPD.27
Micro-thrombosis, secondary bacterial infection and the effects of intrapulmonary shunting, have been proposed as potential mechanisms increasing the risk of severe outcomes from COVID-19 in COPD.28 For all chronic respiratory diseases, reduced lung function at baseline may decrease tolerance to further lung injury from SARS-CoV-2 infection, resulting in poorer outcomes.29 Additionally, individuals with chronic lung disease may experience impaired responses to vaccines, which may lead to increased risk of acquiring SARS-Cov-2 and developing severe complications.30
The lack of association between asthma and severe outcomes from COVID-19 may be attributed to down-regulated ACE2 receptors in those with T2-high asthma, reducing susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection.31 A previous meta-analysis found a similar protective effect of asthma; it is possible that controlling asthma symptoms by routine asthma treatment reduces worsening of symptoms and risk of hospitalization.32
Diabetes
Risk of severe outcomes from COVID-19 was significantly increased in individuals with diabetes, consistent with pre-Omicron studies that reported increased risk of mortality.19,33 Cytokine storm, pulmonary and endothelial dysfunction, and hypercoagulation have been attributed as potential mechanisms increasing the risk of severe outcomes.34
Obesity
Risk of ICU admission and hospitalization were significantly increased in individuals with obesity, but there was no association with death and the combined outcome. A pre-Omicron SLR and meta-analysis found a similar pattern, with increased risk of COVID-19–related hospitalizations, but also death, unlike the current study.35 The increased risk of severe disease may be explained by a hyperinflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 infection linked to high blood levels of saturated fatty acids in patients with obesity,36 as well as predisposition to immunopathological exaggeration of immuno-metabolic disorders.37 A possible explanation for the protective effect from death observed in our study is that where ICU occupancy was reaching capacity within a hospital trust, individuals with obesity were explicitly prioritized in ICU admission decisions. This prioritization could be due to the difficulty in maintaining adequate oxygen levels without mechanical ventilation on a normal hospital ward.38 Consequently, they may have received higher standard of care.38
Quality of Evidence
To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive SLR to assess severe outcomes from COVID-19 in people with comorbidities during the Omicron era. Most of the results included in the meta-analyses were adjusted for age and comorbidities, and main analyses were based on these most adjusted estimates, increasing confidence in the findings. In addition, several sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed, and most sensitivity analyses showed no change in significance from the main analyses, indicating that the pooled estimates are robust.
This study had several limitations. First, there was high clinical and statistical heterogeneity between the studies, due, in part, to variation in interpretation of outcome definitions. This was especially pronounced for the combined outcome as multiple different outcomes were included in its definition. In addition, different adjustments were used between studies: while most studies were adjusted for demographic characteristics, there were variations in adjustments of vaccination rate and comorbidities, reducing comparability of the studies.
Second, while studies included in this review cover wide geographical areas, inter-country differences, such as country-level income, are important predictors of COVID-19 control measures, which in turn affect COVID-19 rates and severity.39,40 However, analysis by geographical region was not performed due to the high between-study heterogeneity and small numbers of studies by region. Finally, due to lack of data, high between-study heterogeneity, and overlap in Omicron subvariant time periods, no sub-analyses were performed by time period, subvariant, vaccine type, or vaccination status. These can be important effect modifiers and should be investigated in future research.
Implications for Practice and Further Research
This study synthesizes data to enhance healthcare providers’ understanding of COVID-19 disease burden in populations with comorbidities during the Omicron era and ensure targeted measures are implemented.
Vaccination is the most effective tool to reduce the risk and prevalence of COVID-19 disease, COVID-19-related hospitalization, ICU admission and death.4,41 Targeting vaccination and other public health measures for those patients at greatest risk due to comorbidity may help prevent or mitigate severe outcomes from COVID-19.
Due to lack of data for several comorbidities in the Omicron era, further high-quality prospective studies are needed to investigate severe outcomes from COVID-19 in the following populations: type 1 and type 2 diabetes, PVD, hypertension, and thrombosis. It would be valuable to investigate the effects of multi-morbidity and the severity of comorbidities on patient outcomes, as well as the reciprocal effect of COVID-19 on the underlying comorbidities.
Finally, further investigations into the impact of age, evolving variants, vaccination status and geographical region on comorbid individuals with COVID-19 in the Omicron era, are likely to provide more insight into disease epidemiology.
Conclusions
This SLR and meta-analysis on the burden of COVID-19 in individuals with comorbidities during the Omicron era demonstrated that those with cerebrovascular disease, COPD, diabetes, respiratory diseases, heart disease, heart failure, and hypertension are at increased risk of death and hospitalization, while individuals with diabetes and obesity are at increased risk of ICU admission, in comparison with those without the respective comorbidity. Of the meta-analyzed comorbid conditions, heart failure was associated with the greatest increase in risk of severe outcomes from COVID-19. Clinicians and policy makers should consider targeting public health measures, such as seasonal vaccination, toward these most at-risk groups to protect vulnerable populations with comorbidities who are at higher risk for developing severe outcomes following COVID-19 disease.
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Disclosures / Conflicts of interest
SA is an employee of BioNtech UK Ltd.
DB has no conflicts of interest.
AC is an employee of Maverex Ltd., which received consulting fees from BioNTech SE.
GL is a consultant and speaker for BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, and Anthos. No fees were received personally. He is a National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator.
TP receives consulting fees from BioNTech SE, GlaxoSmithKline, UNAIDS, and USAID.
EP receives speaker and consultancy fees from Pfizer and Moderna.
HS receives consulting fees and speaker’s honoraria from Amgen, Amarin, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cancom, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, NovoNordisk.
Funding
This study was funded by BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany.
Author contributions
Data sharing
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the individuals, their families and all investigators involved in this study.
Guidance through the review process as well as contributions to systematic review processes, such as screening, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction, were provided by Nick Pooley, PhD (Maverex Ltd), Masoumeh Kisomi, PhD (Maverex Ltd), and Megha Garg, MD (Maverex Ltd). Statistical support, including the design and running of the meta-analyses, was provided by Medha Shrivastava, MSc (Maverex Ltd). Kate Misso, MSc/MCLIP (Maverex Ltd), designed and performed the electronic searches in this systematic review.
Medical writing support, including assisting authors with development of the outline and initial draft, incorporation of comments, figure preparation, referencing, and data checking was provided by Rachel O’Meara, PhD, and editorial support, including formatting, proofreading, and submission was provided by Michelle Seddon, Dip Psychol, all of Paragon (a division of Prime, Knutsford, UK). The study was supported by BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany, according to Good Publication Practice guidelines (Link). The sponsor was involved in the study design, analysis and interpretation of data in the manuscript as well as data checking of information provided in the manuscript. However, ultimate responsibility for opinions, conclusions, and data interpretation lies with the authors.
References
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- 3.
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
- 6.
- 7.↵
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
- 11.↵
- 12.↵
- 13.↵
- 14.↵
- 15.↵
- 16.↵
- 17.↵
- 18.↵
- 19.↵
- 20.↵
- 21.↵
- 22.↵
- 23.↵
- 24.↵
- 25.↵
- 26.↵
- 27.↵
- 28.↵
- 29.↵
- 30.↵
- 31.↵
- 32.↵
- 33.↵
- 34.↵
- 35.↵
- 36.↵
- 37.↵
- 38.↵
- 39.↵
- 40.↵
- 41.↵
- 42.
- 43.
- 44.
- 45.
- 46.
- 47.
- 48.
- 49.
- 50.
- 51.
- 52.
- 53.
- 54.
- 55.
- 56.
- 57.
- 58.
- 59.
- 60.
- 61.
- 62.
- 63.
- 64.
- 65.
- 66.
- 67.
- 68.
- 69.
- 70.
- 71.
- 72.
- 73.
- 74.
- 75.
- 76.
- 77.
- 78.
- 79.
- 80.
- 81.
- 82.
- 83.
- 84.
- 85.
- 86.
- 87.
- 88.
- 89.
- 90.
- 91.
- 92.
- 93.
- 94.
- 95.
- 96.
- 97.
- 98.
- 99.
- 100.
- 101.
- 102.
- 103.
- 104.
- 105.
- 106.
- 107.