Systematic review of genome wide association studies (GWAS) of epilepsy identifies common risk variants and associated genes

S. Jacobs, O. Wootton, V Ives-Deliperi, L.M Tucker, D.J Stein, S. Dalvie
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.31.23294726

Abstract

Background Epilepsy is one of the most prevalent neurological disorders, affecting 50 million individuals worldwide. The aetiology of epilepsy is known to have genetic contributions, yet headline results obtained from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of epilepsy have not always been consistent. We undertook a systematic review of all the findings from this work in order to identify risk variants for epilepsy.

Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the updated PRISMA protocol. EbscoHost, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Primo were searched between the years 2010 – 2024. The quality of each of the studies was evaluated using the Q-Genie tool.

Results 11 studies were included for full extraction, analysis, and quality assessment. Across the identified studies, 79 SNPs, located in 64 genes, were significantly associated with epilepsy at the genome-wide level. The majority of the variants were intronic and intergenic, with the well documented SCN1A the most widely reported gene involved across studies. Two SNPs, rs2292096 and rs149212747, linked respectively to focal epilepsy (FE) and status epilepticus, were exclusively identified in individuals of Asian ancestry, alongside an Asian-exclusive synonymous variant (rs3782886) in BRAP and a missense variant (rs671) in ALDH2.

Conclusions Genes which encode for ion and transport channels, transcription factors, ubiquitin ligase and transporter proteins were identified as potentially involved in the aetiology of epilepsy disorders. The review identified one missense and one synonymous variant which deserve further exploration. Future research should also include populations of more diverse ancestries as this may reveal unique and important epilepsy-associated genes.

1. Introduction

Epilepsy is a neurological disorder, characterized by a combination of clinical and electroencephalographic (EEG) features and affects approximately 50 million individuals worldwide 1. Epilepsy has four main classification types, namely, i) focal onset, ii) generalized onset, iii) combined focal and generalized onset iv) unknown epilepsy onset and v) epilepsy syndromes 1,2,3. Approximately 80% of epilepsy cases occur in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), with a higher incidence than in high income countries (HICs) 4. Specifically, the incidence of epilepsy in HICs is 45 per 100 individuals per year, in comparison to 81.7 per 100 per year in LMICs 5.

In 2017, the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) taskforce updated the classification system for epilepsy to include etiology, age, comorbidities, and genetic associations 1. Collectively, molecular genetics, neuroimaging and animal model studies have shown the impact of genetic variations within the human brain, supporting the idea that specific mutations may influence long-term brain maturation during neurodevelopment, resulting in changes to both the structure and function of the brain. These alterations could contribute to an increased susceptibility to seizures and, ultimately, the development of epilepsy and associated comorbidities 6.

Many forms of epilepsy have a genetic component, with heritability differing per epilepsy type 7. Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) is the most well researched epilepsy type reported to be due to genetic etiology, with over 100 reported genes including SCN1A, SCN2A, KCNQ2 and STXBP 8. With the 2017 updated classification by the ILAE, the taskforce advised that the term genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE) may be used to classify and group a broader range of epilepsy syndromes which are characterized by clinically generalized seizure types associated with generalized, epileptiform spike-wave discharges, which include generalized epilepsy (GE) syndromes. GE has an estimated heritability of 31%9. Idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), is a sub-type of GGE and includes childhood absence epilepsy (CAE), juvenile absence epilepsy (JAE), juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), and generalized tonic-clonic seizures alone (GTCA) 1,9.

Over 95% of epilepsy patients are diagnosed with common forms of epilepsy, which include IGE, temporal and frontal lobe epilepsy (TLE/FLE) and benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS) 9. These forms of epilepsy may involve multiple genetic variants, interacting with environmental factors 10. Such genetic variants have been identified by genome-wide association studies (GWASs) 11. Indeed, over the last decade, multiple GWAS for epilepsy have been conducted, mainly in European-ancestry and Asian-ancestry individuals 12. However, headline findings from different studies have not always been consistent. Here we undertook a systematic review of findings from GWASs of epilepsy in order to identify genetic risk variants for this condition.

2. Materials and Methods

This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO in March 2022 (ID: CRD42022308427). The PRISMA 13 workflow (Figure 1) was used to identify all relevant studies published between the years 2010-2024. We had selected the time period based on the fact that the first GWAS on epilepsy was published in 2010. Filters were included on all searches, where applicable, to identify results for studies that included only human participants and were published in English. Duplicates were removed using Endnote’s native tool before exporting into Covidence for title, abstract and full text screening 14. Studies were included if they were published in English, were primary GWAS, used human participants and were published between 2010-2022. Studies were excluded if they assessed variants other than single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We included GWAS performed for any epilepsy type and did not limit our search to specific sub-types. EbscoHost, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and the University of Cape Town’s (UCT) Primo were selected as the relevant databases for searching. Search strings combining all possible MeSH terms, as well as search strings combining only two terms at a time were run. Search strings included variations of “(GWAS)”, “((genome wide association stud*)/(analys*))”, “(genome wide stud*)/(analys*))”, “(epileps*)” and “(seizure disorders)”. An updated search was done across all mentioned databases in February 2024, after a recent GWAS publication by the International League Against Epilepsy in August 2023.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Overview of screening process.

Study characteristics, which included participant number, number of significant SNPs, sequencing platform, epilepsy type, method of diagnosis and ancestry of participants were tabulated (supplementary materials, Table S1.1). All SNPs reaching genome-wide significance (p < 5 x 10-8), along with their minor allele frequencies (MAF), effect allele, quality score and associated epilepsy type, were extracted (Table 1).

View this table:
Table 1 GWASs of epilepsy, with genome-wide significant SNPs only (p < 5 x 10-8).

The SNPs which reached genome-wide significance were grouped according to their associated epilepsy sub-type as listed in each study, with the corresponding reported candidate gene. The reported SNPs were searched on Ensembl (release 25) 15, with reference genome build GRCh38.14, accessed between 1-15 March 2024, to ensure consistency in reporting of SNPs and associated genes. All studies report using reference genome GRCh37. The primary function of each of the genes was established using the Uniprot database 16.

2.1 Critical appraisal of studies

To appraise the quality of the reviewed studies, the Q-Genie tool was used 17. This tool consists of 11 items rated on a 7-point likert scale which assess the following domains: 1) scientific basis for development of the research questions, 2) ascertainment of comparison groups (cases/controls), 3) technical and non-technical classification of genetic variants tested, 4) classification of the outcome, 5) discussion of source of bias, 6) appropriateness of sample size and power, 7) description of planned statistical analysis, 8) statistical methods applied, 9) test of assumptions used and 10) interpretation of results 17. The following cut-off points were used to determine the quality of each study; scores of ≤35 on the Q-Genie tool indicated poor quality, >35 and ≤45 indicated moderate quality, and >45 indicated good quality 17. A second independent reviewer was involved in the screening and critical appraisal as a means to decrease any possible bias, and increase accuracy of relevant studies.

3. Results

3.1 Overview of literature search

A total of 7,042 studies were identified across all databases using the search strategy described and shown in Figure 1. After removal of duplicates (n = 5,863) and entries which did not fit the inclusion criteria (n = 750); a final total of 429 records were uploaded to Covidence. Covidence automatically excluded an additional four duplicate records, resulting in a total of 425 records for title and abstract screening. A further 401 studies were excluded after screening. These exclusions were reviews, studies which combined epilepsy with a secondary neurological disorder or non-epileptic seizures (NES); and studies which focused on microRNA or copy number variants. From the 24 studies screened for full text, a further 13 studies were excluded due to their study design or outcome not meeting the inclusion criteria, resulting in a final total of 11 studies for full review.

The GWAS included for review were published between 2010-February 2024, with sample sizes ranging from 1,087 to 29,994 for cases and 3,444 to 774,517 for controls (supplementary materials, Table S1.1). The majority of studies (7 of 10) were of European ancestry, while 5 of the 10 studies included a small cohort of individuals of African ancestry. Several studies had overlapping cohorts. For example, Ishagaki et al., (2020) 18, Song et al., (2020) 19 and Suzuki et al., (2021) 20 utilized GWAS from BioBank Japan (BBJ) 21.

3.2 Quality assessment

Table 2 shows the SNPs which reached genome wide significance (p < 5 x 10-8) for each study. The majority of the studies used genomic inflation as the method of quality assessment. Overall, apart from Song et al., (2020) 19 and Ishigaki et al., (2020) 18, all studies had “good global quality”, scoring >45 in Q-genie. Most studies scored between 1-2 for “other source of bias”, as they did not specifically report on such biases. Most studies scored between 1-3 for “sample size and power” as they did not include a power calculation. A detailed breakdown of each study’s scoring can be found in supplementary material (Table S1.2).

3.3 Common risk variants identified from GWAS for epilepsy

A total of 79 significant SNPs (positionally mapped to 64 genes) were identified for epilepsy across all studies (Table 2). From the total of 79 SNPs which reached genome-wide significance (p < 5 x 10-8), one SNP was identified in more than one study. Lead SNP, rs11890028, was reported in the GWAS by Song et al., (2021) 19 and ILAE (2018) 10, which is likely due sample overlap between these two studies. The majority of the SNPs were intronic (n = 41) and intergenic (n =23), with one synonymous (rs3782886) located in BRAP and one missense variant (rs671) located in ALDH2 in Asian ancestry only. Two 3 prime UTR variants were reported, rs1047276, mapped to ZEB2 in JME of European ancestry and rs2292096, mapped to CAMSAP1L1 in FE of Asian ancestry. The chromosomal location of the SNPs varied, with two intergenic variants significantly associated with IGE (rs5928634 and rs5927306) located on chromosome X and mapped to the gene TMEM47. One SNP (rs58069848), associated with FE in both European and African ancestry groups, has not been mapped to any candidate gene.

3.4 Genes associated with epilepsy disorders

Several of the SNPs identified are located in ion channel genes, with sodium channel genes the most commonly reported, specifically sodium channel protein type 1 subunit alpha (SCN1A) which had the highest number of associated SNPs across studies (number of independent significant SNPs = 6). SCN1A was associated with all epilepsy types including mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis and febrile seizures (MTLEHS + FS). SCN2A, SCN3A and SCN8A were also found to be associated across all epilepsy types. Other reported ion channels include GABRA2, KCNN2,GRIK1 and SLC33A1. A number of SNPs associated with all epilepsy types (GGE, FE and unclassified) were reported in Asian ancestry only, within the regions of 12q24.11-13, 4p15.1 and 2q21.3. Two of the SNPs (rs2292096, a 3’ UTR variant, mapped to CAMSAP1L and rs149212747, mapped to LINC02355), identified in individuals of Asian ancestry only, were associated with FE and status epilepticus, respectively.

4. Discussion

In this study, we systematically reviewed the results of GWASs of epilepsy. We found 11 studies with a total of 1,013,632 participants (cases = 90, 383; controls = 923, 249). The majority of these studies were comprised of participants who were predominately of European and Asian ancestry, with only a small percentage of individuals being of African ancestry. SNPs located in genes encoding ion channels, transcription factors, ribosomal protein transporters, ubiquitin ligase and protein deamination and binding are the most frequently reported to be associated with epilepsy. Two SNPs, rs2292096 and rs149212747, linked respectively to focal epilepsy (FE) and status epilepticus, were exclusively identified in individuals of Asian ancestry, alongside an Asian-exclusive synonymous variant (rs3782886) in BRAP and a missense variant (rs671) in ALDH2. We were unable to conduct a meta-analysis due to an overlap in participating cohorts in different publications 10, 19, 21.

Ion channel genes had the highest number of SNPs associated to epilepsy. This is in line with previous animal studies which indicated that ion channel genes account for approximately 25% of the genes identified for epilepsy 22, as well as with prior clinical work. These genes are grouped on the basis of the nature of their ion transport, namely voltage-gated, which includes genes CACNA1I, CACNA2D2, KCNIP2, KCNN2, SCN1A, SCN2A, SCN3A and SCN8A23; and ligand-gated, which includes genes GABRA2 and GRIK124. Ion channels play a crucial role in both the generation and propagation of neuronal action potentials in the central nervous system (CNS), therefore a disturbance in neuronal ionic flow, due to variation in an ion channel gene, may contribute towards the development of a seizure 25.

SCN1A, which is well described to be associated with epilepsy, encodes a voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) primarily expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) and plays a crucial role in generating and propagating action potentials in neural cells26. Mutations in SCN1A can disrupt neural activity, contributing to various forms of epilepsy, including febrile seizures (FE), unclassified epilepsy, and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis and febrile seizures (MTLEHS + FS), across diverse ancestral cohorts. These findings underscore the genetic complexity underlying epilepsy, with sodium channel gene mutations having a range of different impacts on neural function and associated disorders.

PADI6 (Peptidyl arginine deiminase 6) was mapped to several SNPs despite not having been previously associated with epilepsy. PADI6 encodes an enzyme that deaminates proteins in molecular pathways related to epigenetic regulation of histones and autoantibody formation, suggesting that epigenetic control of gene expression may play a role in epileptogenesis 27. This gene was found to only be associated with IGE in individuals of European and African ancestry, with no genome-wide significant SNPs in individuals of Asian ancestry.

FANCL (fanconi anemia complementation group L), which encodes an ubiquitin ligase protein 28, also had several SNPs associated with all epilepsy and GGE. FANCL plays a role in the normal functioning of the immune system and CNS plasticity 29. In individuals with epilepsy, FANCL variants may lead to abnormal changes in the brain structure and function, potentially contributing to the development or maintenance of epilepsy 31. Two SNPs, rs3782886, rs11066001, located in the gene, BRAP 28, which also encodes a ubiquitin ligase protein, were associated with GGE, including symptomatic and unclassified epilepsy in individuals of Asian (Japanese) ancestry. Genetic variations within ubiquitin ligase protein-encoding genes, such as FANCL and BRAP may contribute to the development or persistence of epilepsy due to the impact these variations have on immune system functioning, CNS plasticity and brain structure 31.

SNP rs671, found to be associated with all epilepsy in Asian ancestry, is responsible for the dysfunction of aldehyde dehydrogensase type 2 (ALDH2), which suppresses enzymatic function 28. This missense variant has been associated with a number of diseases including hypertension, cancer, cardiovascular diseases and neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinsons and Alzheimer’s 32. Studies focused on rs671 in recent years have focused on the association between the SNP and alcohol intake in Asian ancestry 33, however the role of this missense variant remains unclear. Another SNP found to be associated with all epilepsy in Asian ancestry was synonymous variant rs3782886 in breast cancer suppressor protein-associated protein (BRAP). Limited functional research has been done on rs3782886, with most existing studies focused on this “Asian-specific” SNP’s association to myocardial infarction and carotid atherosclerosis 34. Both rs671 and rs3782886 deserve further investigation to assess their association with epilepsy.

Two 3 prime UTR variants were found in European, African and Asian ancestry; namely rs1044352 and rs1046276. SNP rs1044352 was associated with GGE, mapped to protocadherin 7 (PCDH7) 28. PCDH7 is a brain-expressed gene that shows elevated levels of expression and has been linked to CNS disorders such as epilepsy 35. The second SNP rs1046276 is located in calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha 1 (CACNA1I) 28 and has only recently been identified to be associated to JME epilepsy 21. Both these 3 prime UTR variants have not been well studied.

The most recent GWAS of epilepsy (ILAE, 2023) reported SNP rs62151809 to be associated to GGE in European, African and Asian ancestry. This SNP mapped to POU class 3 homeobox 3 (POU3F3) 28 which plays a role in the development of the CNS and was first reported to be associated to a neurodevelopmental disorder in 2019, specifically intellectual disability 36. The authors reported a missense variant of POU3F3 in two out of thirteen individuals with mild to moderate neurodevelopmental delay, with both individuals having severe intellectual disability and epilepsy 37.

Several transporter channel associated genes, namely HEATR3 (rs4638568), TTC21B (rs6432877, rs11890028) and SLC33A1 (rs1991545) were found in the GWAS conducted by the International League Against Epilepsy (2018) in their trans-ethnic meta-analysis group, yet not in the GWAS conducted by Song and colleagues (2021), despite an overlap in cohorts 9,18. The SNPs which have been suggested to be associated to both HEATR3 and SLC33A1 were novel, having not been previously associated with epilepsy. The SNP rs4638568 was associated with all epilepsy groups, while rs1991545 was associated with FE only. The exact role of these genes in epilepsy disorders has not been well established and requires further investigation to better understand how variations of these genes influence the development and progression of epilepsy.

In 2022 the ILAE released updated guidelines for the classification of epilepsy syndromes. Were therefore grouped the epilepsy phenotypes according to the most recent classification by the International League Against Epilepsy in our Table 2. An additional challenge for reviewing data obtained from different epilepsy GWASs, is different levels of phenotypic detail are provided . Future studies would benefit from increased phenotypic harmonization.

5. Conclusion

Taken together, the results of this study have illustrated the value of systematically reviewing GWAS findings to prioritise risk variants for epilepsy for future follow-up investigation. Genes within ion and transport channels, in addition to genes encoding transcription factors, ubiquitin ligase and transporter proteins, in particular, should be further explored to assess their potential roles in epilepsy. Given the lack of diversity of those studied in the research reviewed here, future studies should also include participants of more diverse ancestries, particularly within African ancestries. The results of this study assist in identifying the top candidate genes and their associated SNPs for further investigation of the mechanisms underlying various epilepsy syndromes. It is notable that the majority of the SNPs and associated genes that emerged from this review are likely to be implicated in the aetiology of more than one epilepsy type, suggesting that some mechanisms are relevant across the spectrum of seizure disorders.

Data Availability

As no primary data collection was conducted for this review, all data used in this study are publicly available and can be accessed by referring to the original sources cited in the reference list. For any additional inquiries or requests related to the data used in this systematic review, please feel free to contact the corresponding author of the publication.

Author contributions

S. J conceptualization, formal analysis (equal), funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, validation, visualization, writing-original draft preparation; O.W formal analysis (equal), writing-reviewing & editing; V I-D supervision; writing-reviewing & editing (supporting), L.T supervision; writing-reviewing & editing (supporting), D.J S; conceptualization (supporting), supervision, writing-reviewing & editing (equal); S.D conceptualization (supporting), project administration (supporting), supervision (lead), validation (supporting), visualization (supporting), writing-reviewing & editing (equal)

Declaration of conflict of interests and ethical statement

None of the authors have any conflict of interest to disclose. We confirm that we have read the Journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publication and a[rm that this report is consistent with those guidelines. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the University of Cape Town Human Research Ethics Committee (183/2022).

Acknowledgements

The work reported herein was made possible through funding by the South African Medical Research Council through its Division of Research Capacity Development under the SAMRC Internship Scholarship Programme. The content hereof is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the SAMRC.

Footnotes

  • This review was updated in February 2024

References

  1. 1.↵
    Riney, K., Bogacz, A., Somerville, E., Hirsch, E., Nabbout, R., Scheffer, I. E., Zuberi, S. M., Alsaadi, T., Jain, S., French, J., Specchio, N., Trinka, E., Wiebe, S., Auvin, S., Cabralim, L., Naidoo, A., Perucca, E., Moshé, S. L., Wirrell, E. C., & Tinuper, P. (2022). International League Against Epilepsy classification and definition of epilepsy syndromes with onset at a variable age: position statement by the ILAE Task Force on Nosology and Definitions. Epilepsia. doi:10.1111/epi.17240
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    Scheffer, I. E., Berkovic, S., Capovilla, G., Connolly, M. B., French, J., Guilhoto, L., Hirsch, E., Jain, S., Mathern, G. W., Moshé, S. L., Nordli, D. R., Perucca, E., Tomson, T., Wiebe, S., Zhang, Y. H., & Zuberi, S. M. (2017). ILAE classification of the epilepsies: Position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia, 58(4), 512–521. doi:10.1111/epi.13709
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Fisher, R.S., Cross, J.H., French, J.A., Higurashi, N., Hirsch, E., Jansen, F.E., Lagae, L., Moshé, S.L., Peltola, J., Roulet Perez, E., Scheffer, I.E. and Zuberi, S.M. (2017), Operational classification of seizure types by the International League Against Epilepsy: Position Paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia, 58: 522–530. doi:10.1111/epi.13670
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Meyer, A.-C., Dua, T., Ma, J., Saxena, S., & Birbeck, G. (2010). Global disparities in the epilepsy treatment gap: a systematic review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88(4), 260–266. doi:10.2471/BLT.09.064147
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Ngugi, A. K., Kariuki, S. M., Bottomley, C., Kleinschmidt, I., Sander, J. W., & Newton, C. R. (2011). Incidence of epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology, 77(10), 1005–1012. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822cfc90
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Wang Ge, Wu Wenyue, Xu Yuchen, Yang Zhuanyi, Xiao Bo, Long Lili. (2022) Imaging Genetics in Epilepsy: Current Knowledge and New Perspectives. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience. 15. doi:10.3389/fnmol.2022.891621
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    Chen T, Giri M, Xia Z, Subedi Y.N, Li Y. Genetic and epigentic mechanisms of epilepsy: a review. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment. 2017; 13:1841–1859. Available from: doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822cfc90.p
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    Jeffrey, J. S., Leathem, J., King, C., Mefford, H. C., Ross, K., & Sadleir, L. G. (2021). Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy: Personal utility of a genetic diagnosis for families. Epilepsia Open, 6(1), 149–159. doi:10.1002/epi4.12458
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    Hirsch, E, French, J, Scheffer, IE, Bogacz, A, Alsaadi, T, Sperling, MR, et al. ILAE definition of the Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy Syndromes: Position statement by the ILAE Task Force on Nosology and Definitions. Epilepsia. 2022; 63: 1475– 1499. doi:10.1111/epi.17236
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    International League Against Epilepsy Consortium on Complex, E. (2018). Genome-wide mega-analysis identifies 16 loci and highlights diverse biological mechanisms in the common epilepsies. Nature Communications, 9(1), 5269–5269. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07524-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Epicure Consortium., (2012) Genome-wide association analysis of genetic generalized epilepsies implicates susceptibility loci at 1q43, 2p16.1, 2q22.3 and 17q21.32. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21:5359–5372. doi:10.1093/hmg/dds373.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Chang, M., He, L., & Cai, L. (2018). An Overview of Genome-Wide Association Studies. Methods Mol Biol, 1754, 97–108. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7717-8_6
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia. Available at www.covidence.org.
  15. 15.↵
    Fergal J Martin, M Ridwan Amode, Alisha Aneja, Olanrewaju Austine-Orimoloye, Andrey G Azov, If Barnes, Arne Becker, Ruth Bennett, Andrew Berry, Jyothish Bhai, Simarpreet Kaur Bhurji, Alexandra Bignell, Sanjay Boddu, Paulo R Branco Lins, Lucy Brooks, Shashank Budhanuru Ramaraju, Mehrnaz Charkhchi, Alexander Cockburn, Luca Da Rin Fiorretto, Claire Davidson, Kamalkumar Dodiya, Sarah Donaldson, Bilal El Houdaigui, Tamara El Naboulsi, Reham Fatima, Carlos Garcia Giron, Thiago Genez, Gurpreet S Ghattaoraya, Jose Gonzalez Martinez, Cristi Guijarro, Matthew Hardy, Zoe Hollis, Thibaut Hourlier, Toby Hunt, Mike Kay, Vinay Kaykala, Tuan Le, Diana Lemos, Diego Marques-Coelho, José Carlos Marugán, Gabriela Alejandra Merino, Louisse Paola Mirabueno, Aleena Mushtaq, Syed Nakib Hossain, Denye N Ogeh, Manoj Pandian Sakthivel, Anne Parker, Malcolm Perry, Ivana Piližota, Irina Prosovetskaia, José G Pérez-Silva, Ahamed Imran Abdul Salam, Nuno Saraiva-Agostinho, Helen Schuilenburg, Dan Sheppard, Swati Sinha, Botond Sipos, William Stark, Emily Steed, Ranjit Sukumaran, Dulika Sumathipala, Marie-Marthe Suner, Likhitha Surapaneni, Kyösti Sutinen, Michal Szpak, Francesca Floriana Tricomi, David Urbina-Gómez, Andres Veidenberg, Thomas A Walsh, Brandon Walts, Elizabeth Wass, Natalie Willhoft, Jamie Allen, Jorge Alvarez-Jarreta, Marc Chakiachvili, Bethany Flint, Stefano Giorgetti, Leanne Haggerty, Garth R Ilsley, Jane E Loveland, Benjamin Moore, Jonathan M Mudge, John Tate, David Thybert, Stephen J Trevanion, Andrea Winterbottom, Adam Frankish, Sarah E Hunt, Magali Ruffier, Fiona Cunningham, Sarah Dyer, Robert D Finn, Kevin L Howe, Peter W Harrison, Andrew D Yates, and Paul Flicek.(2023) Ensembl. Nucleic Acids Res. 51(D1):D933–D941. doi:10.1093/nar/gkac958
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    UniProt Consortium (2007). The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic acids research, 35(Database issue), D193–D197. doi:10.1093/nar/gkl929
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Sohani, Z. N., Meyre, D., de Souza, R. J., Joseph, P. G., Gandhi, M., Dennis, B. B., Norman, G., & Anand, S. S. (2015). Assessing the quality of published genetic association studies in meta-analyses: the quality of genetic studies (Q-Genie) tool. BMC Genetics, 16(1), 50. doi:10.1186/s12863-015-0211-2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    Ishigaki K, Akiyama M, Kanai M, Takahashi A, Kawakami E, Sugishita H., Sakaue, S., Matoba, N., Low, S.-K., Okada, Y., Terao, C., Amariuta, T., Gazal, S., Kochi, Y., Horikoshi, M., Suzuki, K., Ito, K., Koyama, S., Ozaki, K., Niida, S. (2020) Large-scale genome-wide association study in a Japanese population identifies novel susceptibility loci across different diseases. Nature Genetics. 2020;52:669–679. Available from: doi:10.1038/s41588-020-0640-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    Song, M., Liu, J., Yang, Y., Lv, L., Li, W., & Luo, X.-J. (2021). Genome-Wide Meta-Analysis Identifies Two Novel Risk Loci for Epilepsy. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15. doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.722592
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Suzuki, T., Koike, Y., Ashikawa, K., Otomo, N., Takahashi, A., Aoi, T., Kamatani, N., Nakamura, Y., Kubo, M., Kamatani, Y., Momozawa, Y., Terao, C. & Yamakawa, K. (2021), Genome-wide association study of epilepsy in a Japanese population identified an associated region at chromosome 12q24. Epilepsia, 62: 1391–1400. doi:10.1111/epi.16911
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    Nagai, A., Hirata, M., Kamatani, Y., Muto, K., Matsuda, K., Kiyohara, Y., Ninomiya, T., Tamakoshi, A., Yamagata, Z., Mushiroda, T., Murakami, Y., Yuji, K., Furukawa, Y., Zembutsu, H., Tanaka, T., Ohnishi, Y., Nakamura, Y., BioBank Japan Cooperative Hospital Group, & Kubo, M. (2017). Overview of the BioBank Japan Project: Study design and profile. Journal of epidemiology, 27(3S), S2–S8. doi:10.1016/j.je.2016.12.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Oyrer J, Maljevic S, Scheffer IE, Berkovic SF, Petrou S, Reid CA. (2018) Ion Channels in Genetic Epilepsy: From Genes and Mechanisms to Disease-Targeted Therapies. Pharmacol Rev. 70(1):142–173. doi: 10.1124/pr.117.014456.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    Reid, C. A., Kim, T., Phillips, A. M., Low, J., Berkovic, S. F., Luscher, B., & Petrou, S. (2013). Multiple molecular mechanisms for a single GABAA mutation in epilepsy. Neurology, 80(11), 1003–1008. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872867
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Wallace, R. H., Wang, D. W., Singh, R., Scheffer, I. E., George, A. L. Jr., Phillips, H. A., et al. (1998). Febrile seizures and generalized epilepsy associated with a mutation in the Na+-channel β1 subunit gene SCN1B. Nat. Genet. 19, 366–370. doi: 10.1038/1252
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    Raimondo, J. V., Burman, R. J., Katz, A. A., and Akerman, C. J. (2015). Ion dynamics during seizures. Front. Cell Neurosci. 9:419. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00419
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Bechi G, Rusconi R, Cestèle S, Striano P, Franceschetti S, Mantegazza M. Rescuable folding defective NaV1.1 (SCN1A) mutants in epilepsy: properties, occurrence, and novel rescuing strategy with peptides targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum. (2015) Neurobiol Dis. 75:100–14. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2014.12.028.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Nelson D.L, Cox M.M (2013) Publisher: Susan Winslow, 6th ed. New York, NY: WH Freeman Company
  28. 28.↵
    Ademuwagun IA, Rotimi SO, Syrbe S, Ajamma YU, Adebiyi E. (2021) Voltage Gated Sodium Channel Genes in Epilepsy: Mutations, Functional Studies, and Treatment Dimensions. Front Neurol. 12:600050. doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.600050.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Kasperavičiūtė, D., Catarino, C. B., Matarin, M., Leu, C., Novy, J., Tostevin, A., Leal, B., Hessel, E. V. S., Hallmann, K., Hildebrand, M. S., Dahl, H.-H. M., Ryten, M., Trabzuni, D., Ramasamy, A., Alhusaini, S., Doherty, C. P., Dorn, T., Hansen, J., Krämer, G., & Steinhoff, B. J. (2013). Epilepsy, hippocampal sclerosis and febrile seizures linked by common genetic variation around SCN1A. Brain, 136(10), 3140– 3150. doi:10.1093/brain/awt233
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.
    Silvennoinen, K., Gawel, K., Tsortouktzidis, D. et al. SCN1A overexpression, raises seizure susceptibility. Acta Neuropathol 144, 107–127 (2022). doi:10.1007/s00401-022-02429-0
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    Reynolds, C., King, M. D., & Gorman, K. M. (2020). The phenotypic spectrum of SCN2A-related epilepsy. European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society, 24, 117–122. doi:10.1016/j.ejpn.2019.12.016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Helbig KL, Goldberg EM.(2021) SCN3A-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder. Gene Reviews
  33. 33.↵
    Buono R.J. (2013) Genome wide association studies (GWAS) and common forms of human epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 28:S63–S65. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.07.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    Jang, B., Ishigami, A., Maruyama, N., Carp, R. I., Kim, Y. S., & Choi, E. K. (2013). Peptidylarginine deiminase and protein citrullination in prion diseases: strong evidence of neurodegeneration. Prion, 7(1), 42–46. doi:10.4161/pri.22380
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    Buono, R. J., Bradfield, J. P., Wei, Z., Sperling, M. R., Dlugos, D. J., Privitera, M. D., French, J. A., Lo, W., Cossette, P., Schachter, S. C., Basehore, H., Lohoff, F. W., Grant, S. F. A., Ferraro, T. N., & Hakonarson, H. (2021). Genetic Variation in PADI6-PADI4 on 1p36.13 Is Associated with Common Forms of Human Generalized Epilepsy. Genes, 12(9), 1441. doi:10.3390/genes12091441
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    Aratani, S., Fujita, H., Yagishita, N., Yamano, Y., Okubo, Y., Nishioka, K., & Nakajima, T. (2017). Inhibitory effects of ubiquitination of synoviolin by PADI4. Molecular Medicine Reports, 16, 9203–9209. doi:10.3892/mmr.2017.7764
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. 37.↵
    Puderbaugh M, Emmady PD. Neuroplasticity. [Updated 2023 May 1]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557811/
Back to top
Posted August 27, 2024.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
Systematic review of genome wide association studies (GWAS) of epilepsy identifies common risk variants and associated genes
S. Jacobs, O. Wootton, V Ives-Deliperi, L.M Tucker, D.J Stein, S. Dalvie
medRxiv 2023.08.31.23294726; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.31.23294726
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area