Abstract
Background Neck pain (NP) clinical practice guidelines (CPG) generally emphasize natural history, self-care, and non-pharmaceutical therapies. For non-pharmaceutical therapies provided for NP, like chiropractic manipulative treatment (CMT), active care (AC), manual therapy (MT), or acupuncture, little is known about the dose/response relationship with use of other services and total cost. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study of individuals with NP was to examine the dose response association between the number of visits of CMT, AC, MT, or acupuncture, the exposure to pharmaceutical, imaging, and interventional services, and total episode cost.
Methods Episode of care was used to analyze a national sample of individuals 18 years and older with a single episode of non-surgical NP occurring in 2017-2019 and initially contacting a chiropractor (DC), physical therapist (PT), or licensed acupuncturist (LAc). The number of visits of CMT, AC, MT, or acupuncture were the primary independent variables. Rate and timing of use of 13 types of health care services and total episode cost were the primary dependent measures.
Results A total of 91,805 continuously insured individuals initially contacted a DC, PT, or LAc for a single episode of non-surgical NP. These individuals initially contacted 19,387 different DCs, 1,828 PTs and 1,153 LAcs. There were $39,150,944 in total expenditures. The most common number of visits was 1 to 3 for CMT (47.8% of episodes), AC (31.8%), and MT (35.0%), and 4 to 6 for acupuncture (27.5%). Different levels of utilization intensity of CMT, AC, MT, and acupuncture were generally not associated with statistically or clinically meaningful differences in exposure to pharmaceutical, imaging, or interventional services. Total episode cost increased with higher numbers of visits of CMT, AC, MT, and acupuncture with CMT associated with the lowest median total episode code at each level of visit utilization.
Conclusions For individuals with non-surgical NP initially contacting a DC, PT or LAc, 1 to 3 visits of CMT, AC, or MT, and 4 to 6 visits of acupuncture were the most common levels of utilization. A higher number of visits of CMT, AC, MT or acupuncture was associated with significantly higher total cost, without clinically or statistically meaningful differences in exposure to pharmaceutical, imaging, or interventional services. CMT was associated with the lowest total episode cost at each level of utilization. Higher visit counts of CMT, AC, MT, or acupuncture may have been associated with unmeasured clinical benefits and warrants further study.
Background
Neck pain (NP) is prevalent 1,2 and costly.3 Among spinal disorders, in the absence of red flags of serious pathology low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) describe a stepped approach in which services are sequenced into first-, second- and third-line services.4-6 NP CPGs, while less abundant and more heterogeneous than those for LBP, are similar emphasizing individual self-management, non-pharmacological and non-interventional services as first-line approaches.7-9
Variation in service utilization and cost outcomes for NP has been associated with the initial contact health care provider (HCP).10-14 Like LBP 15, when initially contacted by an Individual with NP, non-prescribing HCPs, like chiropractors (DC), physical therapists (PT), or licensed acupuncturists (LAc) are more likely to have episodes involving non-pharmacological and non-interventional therapies and less use of pharmaceutical, imaging, and interventional services.14
Among spinal disorders, dose response analyses of chiropractic manipulative treatment (CMT), active care (AC), and manual therapy (MT) are more common for LBP than for NP.16-21 LBP dose response analyses have not found a clear association between a higher dose and beneficial impact on cost, quality adjusted life years, disability and pain free days, and other measures of pain and function.19-22 Dose response analyses of CMT, AC and MT for NP are less common 18,23,24, with dose response analyses of acupuncture even less common.25 In a cohort with insurance coverage, an important consideration for analyzing dose/response is patient willingness to pay (WTP) for the co-payments, deductibles or coinsurance associated with CMT, AC, MT, or acupuncture services.26
For individuals with NP initially contacting a DC, PT or LAc the aim of this study was to examine the association between the number of visits of CMT, AC, MT, or acupuncture services, utilization of other health care services, and total cost. The hypothesis was that increasing the number of visits of these services would increase total episode cost and have minimal impact on utilization of pharmaceutical, imaging, and interventional services.
Methods
Study design, population, setting and data sources
This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals with a single episode of non-surgical NP during 2017-2019 for which the individual initially contacted a DC, PT or LAc. The study design was identical to a previous LBP study.27 An enrollee database included deidentified enrollment records, and administrative claims data for all inpatient and outpatient services, and pharmacy prescriptions for enrollees from a single national commercial insurer. Deidentified HCP demographic information and professional licensure status was included in an HCP database. ZIP code level household adjusted gross income (AGI) was extracted from the Internal Revenue Service 28, population race and ethnicity from the US Census Bureau 29, socioeconomic status (SES) Area Deprivation Index (ADI) data, from the University of Wisconsin Neighborhood Atlas®.30
With study data de-identified or a Limited Data Set in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and customer requirements, the UnitedHealth Group Office of Human Research Affairs determined that this study was exempt from Institutional Review Board review. The study was conducted and reported based on the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines (Supplement – STROBE Checklist).31
With numerous potential unknown or unmeasurable confounders, and to avoid creating any causal impressions, the analysis did not adopt standard practice to adjust for typical confounders such as individual age, sex and co-morbidities 32,33 using common yet potentially inadequate approaches such as propensity score matching.34 Potential confounders of CMT, AC, MT and acupuncture visit intensity include: anticipated potential out of pocket costs and WTP; time availability to participate in multiple visits; DC, PT or LAc options convenient to an individual’s home, workplace or daily travel routes and mode of transportation; individual preference type of HCP including gender or racial concordance; recommendations from family or friends; perceived NP severity; and appointment availability within an individual’s timing expectations meeting these and other criteria.35 Actual measures of individual demographic and episodic characteristics, and related associations, were calculated for different levels of visit dose for each service type.
Cohort selection and unit of analysis
To match the timeframe used in an identical study of LBP 27, and to avoid the influence of the COVID-19 epidemic on care patterns in early 2020, the cohort included individuals aged 18 years and older with a single complete episode of NP commencing and ending during the calendar years 2017-2019. All individuals had continuous medical and pharmacy insurance coverage during the entire study period. The study cohort was able to access DC, PT, and LAc HCPs directly without a referral.
The Symmetry® Episode Treatment Groups® (ETG®) and Episode Risk Groups® (ERG®) version 9.5 methodologies and definitions were used to translate administrative claims data into episodes of care, which have been reported as a valid measurement for comparison of HCPs based on cost of care.36 This approach has been shown to be a valid way to organize all administrative claims data associated with a condition.37 The risk of misclassification bias associated with using episode of care as the unit of analysis has previously been demonstrated to be low.14,15,27
With the cohort having continuous insurance coverage, complete episodes were identified as having at least 91-day pre- and 61-day post-episode clean periods during which no services were provided by any HCP for any NP diagnosis. To minimize the influence of complex NP episodes on study results several exclusions were made including episodes including a surgical procedure or associated with diagnoses of fractures and other spinal trauma, congenital deformities and scoliosis, malignant and non-malignant neoplasms, infection, autoimmune disorders, osteoporosis, or advanced arthritis.
Variables
Python (Python Language Reference, Version 3.7.5., n.d.) was used for data preprocessing, table generation, and initial analyses. A goodness-of-fit measure using D’Agostino’s K-squared test was used to evaluate whether measures were derived from a normally distributed sample. Median and interquartile range (IQR) were used to report non-normally distributed data. Simple descriptive statistics were generated for main study variables.
Of the independent variables of type of HCP initially contacted, DC, PT, or LAc HCP, and the number of visits of CMT, AC, MT, or acupuncture services, the analyses focused on services provided for at least 50% of episodes. This resulted in 4 combinations of HCP and service type: DC-CMT, PT-AC, PT-MT, and LAc-acupuncture (Supplement 1).
The percent of episodes including 13 types of health care services was the primary dependent variable. For the percent calculation any type of HCP an individual saw during the episode of NP could provide a service. To facilitate comparison of NP and LBP4, and while NP CPGs do not segment health care services, services were categorized as first-, second-, or third-line using an identical approach as a previous LBP study. 27 Total cost of care for all reimbursed services provided by any HCP during an episode, the number of different HCPs seen during an episode, and episode duration measured in days were secondary dependent variables. Total episode cost included costs associated with all services provided for NP during an episode, including those not specifically identified in the 13 categories used in the analyses. Costs for services for which an insurance claim was not submitted were not available.
Bivariate analyses, risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to evaluate differences in secondary measures compared to the 1 to 3 visit reference for each HCP service type combination. RR were selected instead of odds ratios (OR) due to being more widely understood in associational analyses and because ORs tend to exaggerate risk in situations where an outcome is relatively common.38
Results
19,387 DCs, 1,828 PTs, and 1,153 LAcs were initially contacted by 91,805 individuals with subsequent NP episodes associated with $39,150,944 in reimbursed health care expenditures. While pre- and post-episode clean periods were similar, differences were observed in the attributes of individuals initially contacting DCs, PTs, and LAcs. LAcs were initially contacted by 70.5% females, and by individuals from ZIP codes with lower ADI (median 23), higher AGI (median 91,222) and lower % non-Hispanic white (NHW) population (median 63.8%). PTs were initially contacted by slightly older individuals with higher ERG® Risk Score. DCs were initially contacted by individuals from ZIP codes with higher ADI (median 43), lower AGI (median 67,793), and higher % NHW population (median 76.8%) (Supplement 2).
47.8% of DC-CMT episodes, 31.8% of PT-AC, and 35% of PT-MT had 1 to 3 visits. For LAc-acupuncture, 4 to 6 visits were most common, at 27.5% of episodes (Figure 1). Within each HCP and service type combination, similar characteristics were found in individual, population, and episode attributes among visit count categories (Supplement 3).
Relatively small sample sizes resulted in the bivariate and RR analyses revealing an absence of statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in the exposure to second- or third-line services when AC, MT, or acupuncture were not provided, or when greater than 3 visits were provided. When CMT was not provided by a DC, or when greater than 3 visits were provided, exposure to all second- and third-line services was higher than the 1 to 3 visit reference category. (Table 1) (Table 1a). Figure 2 illustrates the RR for exposure to prescription opioids.
Total episode cost and episode duration increased significantly with an increasing number of visits for all HCP and service type combinations. The DC-CMT combination was associated with the lowest overall median total episode cost ($185, Q1 80, Q3 455) a finding that remained consistent within each visit count category (Table 2) (Figure 4). The median number of different HCPs seen during an episode increased with an increasing number of visits for the PT-AC and PT-MT combinations and was unchanged for the DC-CMT and LAc-acupuncture combinations.
Discussion
This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between the number of visits of CMT, AC, MT, and acupuncture, utilization of other health care services, and total episode cost for individuals with non-surgical NP initially contacting a DC, PT, or LAc. Like LBP 27, for NP the most common level of utilization of CMT, AC, MT was 1 to 3 visits, and 4 to 6 visits of acupuncture. CMT was associated with lowest median total episode cost compared to AC, MT, and acupuncture. While higher levels of visit utilization were not associated with lower rates of imaging, pharmaceutical or interventional services the study was not able to evaluate potential clinical benefits associated with different numbers of visits of CMT, AC, MT, and acupuncture.
Like any retrospective study involving administrative data this study has several limitations. Regarding commercial insurance coverage, variability in benefit plan design, variability in enrollee cost-sharing responsibility, and missing information were potential sources of confounding or bias. Risk is minimized as the cohort had continuous highly uniform commercial insurance coverage and the processing of administrative claims data included extensive quality and actuarial control measures. The commercial insurer HCP database may have included errors or missing information, however the risk of misclassifying DCs, PTs and LAcs is minimized through continuous credentialing and HCP data validation processes. Variation in insurance coverage, network participation contracts, alternative reimbursement models, and individuals seeking treatment outside of the insurance benefit are associated with limitations in summarizing total episode cost. While individuals from all 50 states, the cohort did not describe a US representative sample.
Analyses involving the type of HCP initially contacted by an individual with NP or LBP must contend with the risk of confounding and bias associated with the limited ability to control for individual preference for the type of initial contact HCP and potentially meaningful differences in clinical complexity of individuals seeking services from different types of providers. These risks were minimized, but no eliminated, in this study by limiting the cohort to individuals initially contacting a DC, PT, or LAc, and by excluding NP associated with serious pathology, individuals with multiple episodes of NP, and episodes involving a surgical procedure. More important for this study was an inability to control for individual expectations or requests for specific health care services and WTP for different numbers of visits. An analysis of the change in patient functional status associated with different numbers of visits of CMT, AC, MT, and acupuncture was not possible given the absence of baseline and sequential patient reported outcome data.
This study corroborates and expands upon previous similar studies. When initially contacted by an individual with NP, DCs, PTs, and LAcs are generally associated with greater use of non-pharmaceutical and non-interventional services than primary care, specialist, and emergency medicine/urgent care HCPs.14 This study expands on these observed associations, demonstrating that this guideline concordance benefit is associated with as few as 1 to 3 visits of CMT, AC, MT, and acupuncture services. The study findings corroborate and are nearly identical to a similar study of dose/response of CMT, AC, MT, and acupuncture for LBP.27 The finding that 1-3 visits of CMT was most common for NP and that this dose level was associated with the lowest total cost corroborates an earlier study 24 however the earlier study’s description of this level of dose as discordant with guidelines warrants further study given the finding that this dose level is both the most common and also associated with the lowest level of utilization of pharmaceutical, imaging, and interventional services.
Conclusions
For individuals with a single episode of non-surgical NP initially contacting a DC, PT, or LAc, 1 to 3 visits of CMT, AC, or MT, or 4 to 6 visits of acupuncture, are common and associated with avoidance of pharmaceutical, imaging, or interventional services. Not surprisingly, increasing the number of visits of CMT, AC, MT or acupuncture is associated with total episode cost, however higher numbers of visits are not associated with additional pharmaceutical, imaging, or interventional service avoidance benefits. There are a range of potential confounders to consider when interpreting or translating these findings, and there may have been unmeasured clinical benefits associated with, a higher number of visits of CMT, AC, MT, or acupuncture.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate Because the data was de-identified or a Limited Data Set in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and customer requirements, the UnitedHealth Group Office of Human Research Affairs determined that this study was exempt from Institutional Review Board review.
Consent for publication Not applicable
Availability of data and materials The data are proprietary and are not available for public use but, under certain conditions, may be made available to editors and their approved auditors under a data-use agreement to confirm the findings of the current study.
Competing interests At the time of manuscript submission DE and MZ are UnitedHealth Group employees and UNH stockholders. No other potential conflicts of interest or competing interests exist.
Funding None
List of Abbreviations
- LBP
- Low back pain
- NP
- Neck pain
- US
- United States
- CPG
- Clinical practice guideline
- DC
- Doctor of Chiropractic
- PT
- Physical Therapist
- LAc
- Licensed Acupuncturist
- HCP
- Health care provider
- ADI
- Area Deprivation Index
- NHW
- Non-Hispanic white
- WTP
- Willingness to pay
- STROBE
- Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology
- ETG®
- Episode Treatment Group®
- ERG®
- Episode Risk Group®
- ACP
- American College of Physicians
- RR
- Risk ratio
- OR
- Odds ratio
- SD
- Standard deviation
- CMT
- Chiropractic manipulative treatment
- AC
- Active care
- MT
- Manual therapy