Addiction of Smartphones and Its Relationship to Academic Achievement of Medical Students in Saudi Arabia,2022

Introduction

Today, the world is transforming in the information and communication field. Smartphones have become a must-have device due to their ability to access information faster. Any problem can solve with one touch, and it is not easy for people to live without it, and it can cause behavior change. The current communication condition is as follows: smartphones are the most well-known. It was created to address everyday accessibility difficulties and has hundreds of built-in apps, and laptops are now required to have an internet connection regularly. Smartphones are advantageous for various reasons, including connectivity and information availability [1]. Smartphones have progressively transformed into indispensable educational tools for anyone. They have evolved into an essential educational tool for all students since they allow them to access school materials via e-learning (Blackboard) and obtain any information [2,3], as well as surf the Internet, entertain themselves, and interact. It has become a crucial part of our daily lives, and this trend is expected to continue. Experts, on the other hand, are increasingly emphasizing its drawbacks, such as the disintegration of social bonds [4]. Medical students and junior physicians are more likely to use smartphones in their studies and job, rendering them more exposed to these effects [5]. Mobile phone use has been associated with headaches, physiological irregularities, drowsiness, and tiredness [6]. Smartphones have given people control over how, when, and where they interact with others. Many smartphone users check their phones first thing in the morning and again before bed. Also, users have become accustomed to checking their phones hundreds of times every day. which can lead to “phone addiction” or obsessive phone use [7]. This study aimed to look at the trends in smartphone usage among medical students and see how they affect their academic performance.

According to recent research, technology plays an essential role in many facets of modern life and exposes students to diverse global knowledge [9]. Smartphones have become the choice for college students to communicate messages, complete assignments, and do research [10]. On the other hand, excessive smartphone usage or smartphone addiction may influence academic performance since students tend to use their cell phones for enjoyment rather than academic goals. The Choudhury and Tripathi study [11,12], which looked at the relationship between smartphone addiction and academic performance, found that high smartphone addiction reduces academic performance. The research also discovered an intrinsic association between internet access and smartphone addiction. Teens who have access to the Internet on their cell phones are more likely to communicate with their phones, which can lead to poor academic performance. Smartphone addicts may have poor time management skills since they spend most of their time on their phones and overlook other crucial aspects of their lives. Adolescents’ academic performance may be linked to poor time management caused by smartphone addiction. This is because phone addiction has been linked to poor performance [13]. A 2017 study reported that students nowadays rely on mobile phones for communication and social networking. It has also resulted in the acquisition of a psychological reliance on mobile phones, resulting in sleep deprivation and increased stress, which harms their academic performance. This study aims to see how mobile phone use affects sleep problems.

Furthermore, the findings revealed that the study’s 203 participants utilized smartphones and social media. The time spent on a mobile phone daily ranged from 5 minutes to 10 hours. Almost 72% of the participant’s population Intervention comparator outcome reported poor sleep quality, 66.5% had moderate weariness, and 14.8% experienced severe stress, with the majority (61%) using during the night hours. With smartphones, there was an essential link between poor sleep quality and academic performance [14]. Al-Osaimi et al. (2016., Al-Osaimi et al.) conducted a study to determine the prevalence of smartphone addiction among 2367 university students and the factors that lead to this addiction. The results revealed that 2.27% of the study sample spent more than 8 hours per day on their smartphones, while 75% spent less than 4 hours per day, and as a result of this use, the apps have at least one. Fell Per day, 43% of them sleep, feel energized, and 30% have unhealthy habits such as eating junk food, being overweight, and not exercising. The results showed a positive and substantial relationship between the degree of problematic use and the measure of academic success [15].

Methodology

RESULTS

A total of 330 participants responded to the study questionnaire. The most common age range of study participants was 18-28 years, with 64.2%. Male participants represented 63%. The study population was Saudi citizens. Students from levels 3-4 accounted for 37%, followed by levels 5-6 at 30%. About 54.5% of the study’s income is less than 5000 riyals per month, and the unmarried participants were 55.8% (Table 1).

It was found that using smartphones helped most students study more efficiently, 65%, while 35% were neutral and opposed. Regarding the use of smartphones on academic performance, about 60% of the participants agreed that their study performance had improved. Production of the training course and the enhancement of the effectiveness of their studies using smartphones, about 60% answered in agreement, while 40% were neutral. About 67% found that smartphones are useful in their studies, and the rest, 33%, disagree (Table 2).

Regarding the efficiency of smartphone interaction in social relations with others, 70% agreed, and 30 were neutral and opposed. Speed of feedback was obtained using smartphones, 77% answered in agreement, and 22% were neutral. 44% agreed that they could interact with others using multiple tools. When dealing with others, regardless of their presence, 78% agreed, and the remaining 32% between neutrals and opponents. 70% of the participants reported y they can hold long conversations, and 25% are neutral (Table 3).

Our study found that 69.1% use smartphones to take exams and register for courses, and 31% are neutral. The use of smartphones for training and education sites was in favor with 69.4%, while 30% were neutral. Almost 69% agreed they could complete tasks and presentations, while the remaining 31% were neutral and disagreed. When searching for information using smartphones, we found 87.8% agree, and 11% are neutral (Table 4).

Our study indicates that 81.2% spend more than 5 hours on their smartphone. About 71.2% of the respondents answered that it is difficult for them to turn off their smartphones and go about their day without a smartphone. 58.8% unconsciously use their smartphone to check calls and messages. Phone bill spending was at most 23%, as 76% spent less on their phones than on clothes or food (Figure 5).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 5:

Scores of Smartphones addiction

Discussion

Nearly all Saudi college students use smartphones, especially those studying medicine. Extreme smartphone usage has largely disappeared and is now categorized as addictive behavior[17]. In our study, we assessed the use of smartphones and their relationship to academic performance at the College of Medicine at King Saud University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, in 2022 was the main emphasis of this study. This description of the results makes links with the study’s goals and may be supported by previous literature reviews.

Our statistics and the study of Aznar-Daz et al. are not relatively consistent. The study findings show that more male medical students than female students utilized smartphones. According to Chen et al. (2017), more females than males are present, which contradicts our findings. As for age groups, those between the ages of 18 and 28 (64.2%) and 29 and 39 (34.5%) students had the highest phone addiction rates. However, Aznar-Daz et al. (2019) acknowledged that phone addicts were mainly above 30 and in the age range of 18 to 21. In addition, our research supported this study’s finding that one of the factors contributing to smartphone addiction is work.

Understanding how smartphones are used for academic achievement was the initial research objective. According to the research, 2.7% of students disagree with the 41.2% who claim that smartphones help their academic achievement. The widespread use of smartphones demonstrates the benefits the technology offers its consumers. On the other hand, a 2017 study revealed that developing a psychological reliance on mobile devices causes sleep loss and elevated stress, which has a detrimental effect on students’ academic performance. After looking at the data in Table 2, it was shown that the majority of students believed smartphones to be very beneficial to them since they enhance their performance (41.2%), increase their productivity (39.7%), and are generally helpful for them in their studies (41.5%). Some students did disagree, although their numbers were relatively few. On the contrary, Mohammadi et al. (2020) discovered that despite their advantages, phones were not accepted by students.

The second research objective was to depict interaction competency, which is displayed in table 3, with 40.9% of participants agreeing and 2.7% disagreeing that smartphones are helpful for social interaction. However, a 2017 study found that individuals used their phones far more than average and, as a result, suffered from fatigue, extreme stress, and sleep disturbances. The majority of participants consider smartphones to be socially compelling because users can have lengthy conversations (40%), immediately provide feedback (43%), maintain relationships on social media (40.9%), and communicate in a variety of ways (44.5%). Ihm (2018) further acknowledged that although utilizing phones promoted social support among students, addiction could develop if phones were used excessively.

Explaining the self-efficacy of smartphones, as demonstrated in table 4, was the third research objective. 42.1% of respondents utilized smartphones for course-taking, although only 1.5% did not. Choudhury and Tripathi (2018) established a direct link between smartphone addiction and internet access, resulting in subpar academic performance. Students overwhelmingly stated that smartphones made it easier for them to take tests (40.3%), read course material (40.6%), make presentations (43.3%), and search and browse online (33.6%). The findings of our study are consistent with Mohammadi et al. (2020), who noted that smartphones draw students’ attention using software applications like Word, Excel, and PowerPoint.

As demonstrated in table 5, the fourth research objective was to assess smartphone addiction. Results indicate that 41.2% of respondents did not check their smartphones for calls or messages, while 58.8% did so unintentionally. The findings indicated that the students had developed a dependence on their smartphones since they admitted to using them frequently (81.2%), being unable to put them away (72.1%), and finding it difficult to live without them (69.1%). According to Choudhury and Tripathi (2018), adolescent students’ academic success may be affected by poor time management brought on by smartphone addiction.

Study limitations and recommendations for future Studies

The use of smartphones among medical students in Saudi Arabia has grown in recent years due to the public’s interest in the technology. Smartphones are becoming a daily need for university students, which is another factor contributing to the high usage level. However, there are several gaps and limitations in this study. Although this study was restricted to a particular campus, the implications of smartphone use by university students extend to all higher education institutions. It is appropriate for a study of this kind to be conducted at other academic institutions.

Further research should be conducted to investigate the influence of smartphones on university students’ continuous concentration in their academics and college attendance. There has to be research on how students write academically and smartphone usage in developing nations. A study on how smartphones affect students’ cultural values and worldviews should be conducted, among other things. Due to a lack of time and resources, this study could not cover these topics.

Conclusion

Our study found a significant correlation between phone addiction and a drop in academic performance. Despite its attractiveness, smartphone addiction is a time waster for students that might disrupt their sleep and causes stress. The wise use of smartphones in e-learning services is promising, so it is vital to create a comprehensive plan that guides students toward productive use