Abstract
Background Employers in Canada are increasingly offering physician services to their employees, often through third party workplace “enterprise healthcare” platforms. To date however, little work has been done to understand this method of organizing and delivering care.
Objective To understand the nature, extent and implications of enterprise healthcare physician services in Canada.
Methods We conducted structured internet and database searches to identify enterprise healthcare platforms that provided physician services and their public websites. To answer our research question, We extracted data from company websites and linked company documents as well as information from Mergent Intellect, a web-based application with business data on Canadian companies.
Results We identified nine companies offering enterprise physician services to employees in Canada via 11 enterprise software platforms. According to company claims, over four million Canadian employees and their family members have access to enterprise physician services. All platforms offer virtual physician services and five also facilitate in person visits. Ten of the platforms provide primary care services and one offers only addiction medicine services. Four of the platforms offer to communicate and share information with an employee’s regular primary care provider. Five state they share aggregate or de-identified health data with employers.
Conclusions Enterprise healthcare companies provide millions of Canadian employees and their families with rapid access to virtual physician services and, in some cases, in person care. These services may disrupt continuity of care (care by the same provider over time) and pose risks to employee privacy. As other Canadians do not have access to these services, enterprise healthcare is also introducing two-tiered healthcare across Canada potentially affecting the sustainability of the public healthcare system.
Introduction
Employers in Canada are increasingly offering physician services to their employees, typically through a third party company (1–5). The third party companies enable virtual physician services through a workplace “enterprise healthcare” platform (Box 1). Some also facilitate in person physician care through the platforms (6). The companies claim the enterprise platforms improve access to care, leading to lower rates of employee absenteeism (7,8) and a good return on investment for employers (7–9). Some enterprise healthcare companies may share de-identified employee health data with employers (10–12). The companies state that data sharing allows employers to evaluate the health services they provide and identify ways to reduce employee absenteeism. Data sharing, however, also has implications for employee privacy and autonomy.
Enterprise healthcare differs from the traditional model of healthcare in Canada where most people receive care from self-employed physicians working independently or in small groups in community clinics (13). These physicians either bill the provincial/territorial single-payer public health system – known as “Medicare” – or, much less commonly, bill patients directly (14–16). Until recently, these physicians, working in the traditional model of care, rarely provided virtual care; only three percent of Canadians reported a virtual care physician visit in 2018 (17). With the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, and the introduction of public funding for virtual care, more physicians started offering these services (18). In the province of Ontario, for example, virtual care visits increased 56-fold to comprise over 70% of all visits between March 2020 and July 2020 (19).
Despite the apparent widespread access to enterprise healthcare in Canada, little work has been done to understand the extent and nature of this method of organizing and delivering physician services, nor the implications for employees and for the health system. Our research objective, therefore, was to gain an understanding of the nature, extent and implications of enterprise healthcare in Canada through a national environmental scan.
Methods
We conducted structured internet searches between December 3rd, 2021 and April 1st, 2022 to identify enterprise platforms that provide physician services to company employees in Canada. The search terms used consisted of terms pertaining to the topic areas of virtual care, Canada, and enterprise. We ran each of the searches individually and examined the first 50 results looking for relevant findings. We compared our findings to a list we compiled when conducting a previous research study examining direct-to-patient virtual care in Canada to ensure our search terms were identifying all relevant platforms. We then identified the company that owned the platform.
Inclusion/exclusion criteria
We included platforms if the company could be contracted by an employer to provide physician healthcare services through a proprietary software platform to employees living in Canada. We only included companies that provided physician services as these historically are part of Canadian Medicare, whereas many other clinical services (e.g., counseling) are not. We included companies with platforms that provided physician visits through both synchronous (e.g., phone calls, video chat, in person) and asynchronous communication (e.g., text communication). We excluded companies if they provided services solely to employees living outside of Canada or if they offered only non-physician services. We only included companies with platforms using the English language.
Identification of documents
For each enterprise healthcare platform we included, we identified the platform’s public website and any linked websites or documents. We also searched Mergent Intellect, a publicly accessible, web-based application offering business data for a collection of US and Canadian private and public corporations (21). This database contains basic company information, as well as financial, industry, and executive details for over 1.6 million Canadian businesses. It offers information on corporate structures, including a list of key executives and a complete company family tree.
Data extraction and analysis
We extracted information on the company’s corporate structure, company headquarters, countries of operation, ownership (publicly-traded or privately held), communication mode(s) (e.g., in person, text, phone, or video), primary care physician services, specialist services, payment for physician services (private or public), in person services, system navigator services, family coverage for services, sharing of data with employers and information on communication with an employee’s regular primary care provider. Where available, we also collected information on company claims about number of Canadian enterprise clients (employers) and number of enterprise members (employees and their family members) in Canada.
Ethics
As we only used publicly available documents, we received a research ethics board exemption from Women’s College Hospital.
Results
We identified 11 enterprise healthcare platforms offering physician services to employees in Canada. These enterprise care companies claim to provide services to more than 44,000 companies and 4.5 million employees and their family members (Table 1). Seven of the 11 companies are publicly-traded. Ten companies are based in Canada and one in the U.S. (Table 2). All companies offer virtual care physician services and five also arrange in person visits through their platform. Ten companies offer primary care and one company offers only addiction physician services. Seven provide coordinated access to specialist appointments and six provide a system navigator to help employees navigate the health system. Four platforms offer to provide information to an employee’s regular primary care provider and five state they provide employers with aggregate or de-identified employee health information.
Discussion
Our environmental scan provides insight into enterprise physician services in Canada. Enterprise healthcare companies provide millions of Canadian employees and their families with rapid access to virtual physician services and, in some cases, in person care. These services may disrupt continuity of care (care by the same provider over time) and pose risks to employee privacy. Further, as many people living in Canada do not have access to these services, the model is also introducing two-tiered healthcare broadly across Canada. This is likely to increase disparities in care and costs to the public health system.
Our analysis indicates that some employees may experience disruptions to continuity of care. Less than half of the platforms enable in-person physician visits, implying patients are expected to seek care from their regular care provider or the emergency department for complicated issues. As a result, employees are likely to experience a disruption to continuity of care (care by the same provider over time), a challenge for effective management of chronic and complex health conditions (6).
As some of these enterprise care companies state they share de-identified or aggregate patient data with employers and/or third parties, this method of delivering healthcare may present additional risks to employees. Although the risk of re-identification, is likely to be low if the data are de-identified or aggregated (1,22), sharing data with employers can enable other privacy-related harms such as surveillance and discrimination. For example, the data can be used to identify the characteristics of employees who are likely to have complex health conditions or who may have a high-risk pregnancy (10–12,23). Companies may use this information to improve services for these types of employees. They may also, however, use this information in job recruitment algorithms to ensure these individuals are not offered employment in the first place (24–26).
Enterprise healthcare is also introducing a two-tiered system, where millions of employees and family members have access to physician services not available to other Canadians. This may worsen health disparities. Employees of larger companies are often from a higher socio-economic stratum than other people living in Canada, and part of a group that already has better access to care (13), and better health outcomes (21–24). Further, studies show that a two-tiered system is likely to increase wait-times for those in the public system by luring physicians and other healthcare providers to the enterprise system (27–29).
Finally, enterprise healthcare may lead to “cream-skimming” (30,31). As mentioned above, many enterprise platforms do not offer in person assessments meaning that physicians working for these platforms can only treat simple medical problems. Patients who have complicated health issues are shunted to the emergency department or back to their regular primary care provider (28,32,33). This may increase the burden on the public health system (30,31). Recent research supports this concern. A Canadian study found that patients who had a virtual care visit with a commercial virtual care platform were more likely to have an emergency department visit that those who had a virtual care visit with their regular primary care provider (18).
Limitations
Our study is limited by the fact that we relied on company documents to answer our research questions. Additionally, we were not able to find information on whether physician services were billed to the public system, or if companies paid for these services privately.
Conclusion
Enterprise healthcare seeks to provide employees with rapid access to physician services. This method of organizing and delivering care, however, may also expose employees to harms, as well as pose threats to the sustainability of the public healthcare systems in Canada. More research is needed to further explore this method of delivering and funding physician services in Canada including how the system functions economically, who the system benefits and the implications for employees, other people in Canada and the publicly-funded health systems.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
Conflicts of interest
None declared.
Acknowledgements
This project received funding from the Social Science and Humanities Council of Canada (SSHRC). Sheryl Spithoff receives funding from a New Investigator award from the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto.
Footnotes
Two additional enterprise virtual care platforms were identified following initial manuscript submission, the abstract and results section, as well as Tables 1 and 2 have been updated accordingly. Search dates in the methods section were also updated to reflect this. Two variables presented in Table 2 were grouped together under the title of 'data sharing'. A limitations section was added, and small edits were made to the content of the introduction section.