Abstract
Background As COVID-19 Omicron variant spread in several countries, healthcare workers’ (HCWs) perceptions of vaccine effectiveness, booster and worries warrant reassessment.
Methods Online questionnaire among HCWs in Saudi Arabia (KSA) was collected between Dec 1-6, 2021, aiming to assess their Omicron variant’s perceptions, worries, and booster-vaccine advocacy.
Results Among the 1285 HCWs participants in the study, two-thirds were females, 41% were nurses,46.4% were physicians, and 50% worked in tertiary care hospitals. Vaccination was perceived to be the most effective way to prevent the spread of Omicron variant and future variants by 66.9%. The respondents perceived social distancing (78%), universal masking (77.8%), and avoiding unnecessary travel (71.4%), slightly superior to vaccination to prevent COVID-19 variants spread. Of the respondents, 99.5% received two doses of COVID-19 vaccine. Regarding the booster dose, 96% either received it or planned to receive it once they are eligible. 57.7% of the respondents agreed that Omicron could cause a new COVID-19 wave worldwide, 45.9% agreed it may cause another COVID-19 wave in Saudi Arabia and 46.1% indicated the possibility of another lockdown. Overall, the HCWs worry level of the Omicron variant correlated significantly and strongly with their perception of the effectiveness of vaccination and preventive measures. Male HCWs had a significant agreement with mandatory vaccination of all eligible adult populations while HCWs who are unwilling to receive the vaccine had a strong disagreement with mandatory vaccination.
Conclusions The current study was conducted in the first week of Omicron variant discovery in KSA and only two-thirds of HCWs felt that vaccination is the best option to prevent the variant spread, indicating the need to further motivation campaigns for vaccination and booster doses education among HCWs. HCWs had a strong belief in non-pharmacologic interventions that should be encouraged and augmented. It is important to further study and enhance coping strategies for HCWs as we move through the third year of the pandemic with more potential variants, to protect HCWs from fatigue and burnout.
1 Introduction
The B.1.1.529 variant of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) from South Africa on November 26, 2021[1]. This emerging variant was named Omicron and designated as a Variant of Concern (VOC). This variant has many mutations, some of which are concerning. Preliminary evidence suggests an increased risk of reinfection with this variant. The Omicron variant had been reported in 110 countries across all six WHO Regions as of December 22, 2021[2]. The scientists were concerned about this variant because it has more than 30 mutations on its spike protein, with an S-gene target failure on a specific PCR assay due to the presence of a 69–70del deletion as was previously described with the alpha variant[1,3].
In addition, the B.1.1.529 variant was thought to have a higher transmissibility rate than circulating variants[4]. In addition, there is a concern about the coverage of current vaccines against this variant[5]. A recent study showed a 41-fold decline of the geometric mean titer (GMT) inverse of the plasma dilution required for 50% reduction in infection FRNT50) with omicron compared to previous infection with wild-type virus, with a 3-fold reduction in FRNT50 with the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2. However, it is likely that previous infection followed by vaccination, or a booster dose for those completing their primary series, will likely increase neutralization levels that would confer the needed protection against severe disease from the emerging omicron variant[6].
As new variants emerge, HCWs must continue to serve non-COVID cases while still fulfilling personal commitments for their families and themselves. Burnout, emotional exhaustion, mental distress, depression and psychological stress have been linked to HCWs during this pandemic, and research continues to reveal high rates[7]. In addition to patient care, HCWs must keep up with any development in relation to emerging variants and their effects on clinical presentation, management, and measures of prevention, such as the role of additional booster doses. Thus, we undertook this study to assess the HCWs awareness about the COVID-19 Omicron variant, their worries levels of the different available variants, their perception of the effectiveness of the current vaccinations and other preventive measure to prevent the spread of the Omicron variant or other future variants and asses their perception for the mandatory vaccination of adult population.
2 Method
2.1 Data Collection
This is a cross-sectional survey (appendix 1) among HCWs in Saudi Arabia (KSA) conducted between Dec 1-6, 2021. At the time of this data collection, KSA Ministry of Health (MoH) and several countries had reported infection with the Omicron variant. Participants were invited by a convenience sampling technique through various healthcare providers’ social media platforms, such as WhatsApp and Twitter, and emails.
HCWs were surveyed regarding their Omicron variant awareness, perceptions of the effectiveness of vaccinations and other preventive measures with the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 variant to prevent its spread or other future variants. The last part of the survey was focused on the HCW’s resilience, anxiety and coping strategies, and was published as preprint[8]. The questionnaire was pilot-validated and sent through SurveyMonkey© electronic platform. The current survey was adapted from our previously published studies, with modifications related to the new Omicron variant [9-12].
Participants were notified in the first part of the questionnaire about the purpose of the study and that their participation was voluntary. The Institutional Review Board at the College of Medicine and King Saud University approved the study (approval 21/01039/IRB).
2.2 Statistical analyses
The mean and standard deviation were used to describe continuous variables, frequency and percentage to describe the categorically measured variables. The histogram and the K-S statistical test of Normality were used to assess the statistical Normality assumption of the continuous variables and Levene’s test was used to assess the homogeneity of variance statistical assumption. The multiple response dichotomies analysis was used to analyze the multiple response variables. The 5 point Likert score was analyzed in categorical method, as the responses were grouped into two main groups in analysis;1. Agree: includes those who choose agree or strongly agree options, 2. Disagree: including those who choose disagree or strongly disagree or neither agree nor disagree options, as our aim was to assess the HCWs undoubtful, unshakable agreement with the vaccines or other preventive methods to prevent the spread of the Omicron or other future emerging variants and to assess their perception of mandatory vaccination. Pearson’s correlations test (r) was used to assess the correlations between metric variables. The Multivariate Binary Logistic Regression Analysis was used to assess what may explain the healthcare workers perceived ineffectiveness of covid19 vaccines. The associations between predictors and people’s odds of believing the vaccines are ineffective was expressed as Odds Ratio with associated 95% confidence interval. The SPSS IBM statistical analysis program Version#21 was used for the statistical data analysis. The statistical significance level was considered at 0.050 Level.
3 Results
A total of 1285 HCWs completed the online survey. Table 1 highlights their baseline characteristics. The majority were females (64%). 70.9% of them aged between 25 and 44 years. The majority were expatriates (62.3%). Regarding their clinical role, most of them were nurses (41%), and (46.4%) were physicians of whom (24%) were consultants. (50%) of them work in tertiary institutes while two thirds of them worked in the OPD or general wards.
Almost all our participants didn’t travel to countries where Omicron variant has been recorded (97.9%). Most HCWs haven’t been in contact with COVID-19 patients (71%) during the last 3 months while 22.3% of the HCWs developed COVID-19 previously.
Regarding COVID-19 vaccination, 99.5%received two doses of the vaccine, and the percentage of the first dose was split equally between AstraZeneca and Pfizer vaccines, while three quarters received the second dose as Pfizer vaccine. Regarding the booster dose based on the local regulations, 94.1% either received or planning to receive it once being eligible according to timing criteria (Table 2).
Table 3 explores the participating HCWs awareness concerning certain facts and queries related to the Omicron variant. Almost all the participating HCWs (93%) knew that the Omicron variant was first described in South Africa, on the other hand (81.7%) expected that the Omicron variant will be reported in Saudi Arabia. Regarding the Omicron scientific and medical concerns, 66% of HCWs knew that it is more transmissible than the Delta variant while 26.7% weren’t sure. The majority (71.8%) didn’t know that the Omicron spike protein has 22 mutations. Still, 56.2% knew that it causes similar signs and symptoms to the original strain. Most (85.1%) of our cohort were aware that SARS-CoV-2 mutations are expected while they almost split equally regarding their opinion if the Omicron variant may/may not/unsure cause more severe disease compared to the previous strains. About half of the participants were unsure if mRNA or vector-based vaccines are effective against the Omicron variant. At least two thirds of them were unsure if therapeutics like monoclonal antibodies that were used against the previous strains might be effective against it.
The mean of participants’ self-rated familiarity with the Omicron and Delta variants of the COVID-19 based on 5-point Likert scale were 3.24, 3.5, respectively. When we explored the participants sources of information about the Omicron variant, we found that the MOH and WHO websites were the main sources, but the social networks were also of the same weight compared to them (about 50%), followed by Official statements 41%, hospital announcements 38%, then CDC and Saudi CDC websites almost equally between 30-33%, while scientific journals were down the list 16%.
Our primary objective is to assess the HCWs perception about vaccines effectiveness to prevent the spread of Omicron variant or other future variants, we found that (66.9%) of them agreed, while when considering other preventive measures like universal masking, social distancing, avoiding unnecessary international travel, their agreement was (77.8%), (78%), (71.4%) respectively. (82.2%) of the participating HCWs felt that the COVID-19 vaccination should be mandatory for all eligible adult population, while only 5.1% disagreed (Table 4).
Almost have of the HCWs (42.7%) perceived that any of the current mRNA vaccines (Pfizer or Moderna) will be the best booster COVID-19 vaccine, while (26.9%) felt that a new mRNA vaccine that is developed to better cover the Omicron variant is the best, and 26.2% felt ok receiving any available vaccine as a third booster dose (Table 4)
Regarding the participants perceived risk from the Omicron variant, (16.9 %) of them felt that patients with immune deficiency are at the highest risk, followed by elderly (14.9%), HCWs (14.1%) and then patients with chronic medical illnesses (Table 4).
When assessing the participants perceptions about the future perspectives of the Omicron variant locally and internationally, (57.7%) agreed that it has the potential to cause a new COVID-19 pandemic wave worldwide, while only (45.9%) agreed it may cause another COVID-19 wave in Saudi Arabia and (46.1%) to cause a lockdown (Table 4). Our cohort of HCWs had the highest worry level from international travel followed by the new Omicron variant and then their worry level from the original COVID-19 strain and Delta variant were comparable while their worry level from the alpha strain was the lowest.
HCWs perceptions of vaccination and other preventive measure to prevent COVID-19 variants spread
The HCWs belief in universal masking, social distancing, and avoiding unnecessary international flights to prevent COVID-19 variant spread correlated strongly, significantly and bidirectionally with their belief that vaccines are still the most effective way to prevent omicron variant spread, the same was observed with their mean worry level of international travel and their agreement that COVID vaccine should be mandatory for all adults. Their mean worry level of the Omicron variant correlated significantly and strongly with their perception of the effectiveness of the above preventive measures including vaccination to prevent its spread. While their self-rated familiarity with it or Delta variant, correlated strongly and significantly only with vaccination to prevent Omicron spread. Still their self-rated familiarity with the Delta variant correlated significantly and strongly with their belief in the effectiveness of the vaccines to prevent the Omicron spread, but weakly with universal masking, social distancing, and avoiding unnecessary international flights to prevent the potential spread of the newly emergent Omicron variant Table 5.
To study our main objective, the HCWs’ belief in the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine in preventing the spread of the Omicron newly emergent variant and other future mutants, we ran multivariate logistic regression analysis of multi-variables related to the HCWs’ and their perception of the ineffectiveness of the vaccines to prevent the spread of COVID-19 mutant strains, as those who agreed that vaccines are still effective in preventing the spread of the disease were the majority, therefore we ran the analysis for those who believed that the vaccines are ineffective in preventing the spread. HCWs age correlated linearly with their perceived ineffectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines to prevent the spread of mutant strains especially Omicron, that relation was more pronounced and significant for those aged 55 and above (P 0.034) (Figure 1). HCWs who strongly believed that universal masking and avoiding unnecessary international flights are still effective ways to prevent the spread of mutant strains they significantly didn’t agree with the ineffectiveness of the vaccines to prevent the spread of current and future mutant strains.
Also, those who believed that COVID-19 vaccine should be mandatory for all adults or believed that mutant strains is expected phenomenon also strongly didn’t believe in the ineffectiveness of the vaccines. Interestingly, HCWs who work in critical care areas significantly believed that COVID-19 vaccines are ineffective to prevent the spread of mutant strains. Regarding the HCWs source of information, those who relied on WHO significantly didn’t believe in the efficacy of the vaccines to prevent the spread of current or future mutant strains (Table 6).
The surveyed HCWs characteristics analysis has shown that males were significantly against the vision of disagreement of mandatory vaccination of all eligible adults compared to females, the same was found more significantly for the Expatriates, while age didn’t correlate with mandatory vaccination perception at all. The HCWs who relied on social media as source of information were significantly against the disagreement of mandatory vaccination for all adults, the same was observed for their Self-Rated familiarity level with Omicron mutant.
Those who were absolutely unwilling to receive the vaccine were 5 times more in disagreement of mandatory vaccination. Agreement level with effectiveness of vaccines to prevent mutant spread was significantly associated with the agreement of mandatory vaccination, the same was observed with agreement level of possible second national lockdown due Omicron mutant. While those who agreed with the effectiveness of unnecessary travel avoidance to prevent mutant spread were 1.5 times in disagreement of the mandatory vaccination for all eligible adults. (Table 7)
4. Discussion
This study explored HCWs’ perceptions and beliefs of vaccine effectiveness and advocacy in relation to the emerging SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in KSA. Most respondents were females (62%), similar to a previous study about the Delta variants concern in KSA, and in agreement with other studies showing females to be the mainstream among HCWs[11,13,14].
An interesting observation in the current study is the relatively low percentage of contact with COVID-19 patients as only one-third of participants reported any contact over the past three months, previous reports from KSA showed that contact was as high as 78% and 76% in the beginning of vaccine rollout and during the delta variant emergence, respectively. This may be due to the overall drop in the incidence rate and increasing vaccine uptake within KSA over the past few months[15]. In contrast, almost 22% reported being previously diagnosed with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, compared to only 9% in the beginning of vaccine rollout, but similar to that reported during the delta variant emergence. This difference could be due to the longer exposure with the lapse of time between the initial introduction of vaccines in late December 2020 and the slow but steady vaccine uptake by HCWs[13,16].
One-fifth of study participants received a booster dose while the majority reported planning on receiving it as they become eligible, i.e., three to six months from reception of their second dose, with a small percentage (6%) not planning to receive the booster dose. While the choice was 69.6% for any of the current or a new mRNA vaccine, mRNA vaccines were preferred in another Gulf country study among HCWs, which could be partly due to the hematological side effects that have been recorded with the viral vector vaccines[17]. Also, this could signal vaccine selectivity (VS) that is currently an emerging public health challenge due to the multiplicity of vaccine options in many countries. VS defined as an individual’s or public’s preference for specific vaccines based on their mode of action or brand rather than a general preference for immunization[18].
Although no further exploration of the reasoning behind such decision, misinformation and reliance on social media have been found to be the main drivers of vaccine hesitancy. Such reliance on social media as reported by almost half of the study participants as opposed to less than one-third who reported utilizing scientific journals for their source of information is alarming within the healthcare community. Increased access to peer-reviewed journals should be strongly encouraged among HCWs. Exploring different hindering factors and the true role of open access journals in distributing science within healthcare communities, especially during times of global health crisis, is urgently needed[19]. In an attempt to combat vaccine hesitancy and to confront the new surge in cases, KSA MoH mandated COVID-19 vaccination and made it a requirement to enter public or private institutions, including’s shops, mall and governmental offices. Despite extensive evidence of vaccine efficacy and safety, the persistent inadequate immunization coverage in some countries with the surge in COVID-19 hospitalizations, may warrant mandatory vaccination policy.
The majority of HCWs were aware to some degree of the emergence of the Omicron variant and almost 80% were aware of its emergence in KSA. This is not surprising, as the Saudi MoH announced the first reported case of Omicron on the day of launching our survey[20]. The primary concerns regarding Omicron are whether it is more infectious, more severe, or both, in comparison to other strains, and how likely it would evade natural and vaccine-induced immunity[21]. But with more than 30 mutations and some deletions that are similar to other strains, increased transmissibility and higher antibody escape were expected[22]. However, with very few clinical and epidemiological data to help define the true threat of Omicron, participants mixed responses are expected[23].
Among our study participants the perceived effectiveness of the various COVID-19 preventive measures varied, universal masking policy was rated as the highest preventive measure against Omicron variant. It was implemented in KSA in April 2020 in hospitals followed by community mask mandate. The World Health Organization (WHO) broadened mask guidance on Dec 22, 2021 by” recommending the use of masks as part of a comprehensive package of prevention and control measures to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Even when used correctly, a mask alone is insufficient to “provide adequate protection or source control. Other public health and social measures include testing, isolation, contact tracing, quarantine, adequate ventilation in indoor settings, a physical distancing of at least 1 meter, hand hygiene, and respiratory etiquette.[24]”
Of concern, the perceived effectiveness of the current COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron variant among the surveyed HCWs was 67%, while one third expressed possible lack of efficacy. This represent a decline in HCWs perception of vaccine efficacy compared to our earlier study done on December 2020 during the initial rollout of COVID-19 vaccine which was 80.2%[19]. Such finding reflects declining confidence in vaccine efficacy against emerging variants which is noteworthy since concerns about efficacy have been stated as one of the main reasons for vaccine hesitancy[25]. COVID-19 vaccine-related uncertainty and challenges persist in the face of developing COVID-19 variants. Immune escape is a real concern with omicron variant. According to findings from South Africa, the efficacy of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine against omicron was significantly reduced, with a 41-fold lower level of neutralizing antibodies when compared to the wild strain of SARSCo-V2[6].
The fact that 82.2 percent of HCWs advocate obligatory COVID-19 vaccination for all adults is an interesting finding in our study. Mandating immunizations for HCWs or other business employees is not only ethical, but it is also legal. Employers have the right to require vaccination as a condition of employment, as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and courts have stated[26]. This right applies to both vaccinations approved for emergency use and those that have been fully approved by the FDA. Mandates, on the other hand, can erode public support, causing a backlash and even lowering vaccine uptake. There are no established processes to enforce population-wide vaccination obligations in most countries, despite the fact that employers, health care providers, and educational institutions can monitor compliance with mandates. Requiring COVID-19 immunizations for HCWs for example is not a new practice; rather, it is a continuation of a long-standing policy. Vaccination against influenza, hepatitis B, and other infectious diseases has long been mandatory in many health-care settings[27]. Whether to mandate COVID-19 vaccination for HCWs and /or all employees and how to implement such a policy is ultimately a local authority decision. For instance, local authority at both New York and California announced mandating the vaccine for state employees [28].
The highest worry level reported by HCWs was toward international travel. This could be explained by the fact that many of the respondents are expatriate. The need for travel for upcoming holiday season as well as worry from travel bans presumed to prevent the spread of omicron variant are potential contributing factors. Currently the WHO has urged persons over the age of 60 not to travel[29].
On further exploring HCW’s sources of worry, the most cited concern was contracting COVID-19 and then transmitting it to a family member. This observation is consistent with our earlier research conducted during the first wave of the pandemic[10] as well as other report where such worry was reported in up to 87.4 % of HCWs[30,31]. Following prevention guideline issued by health care authorities, social distancing and seeking family support were the three most common techniques employed by HCWs to deal with this emerging variant. Likewise, during SARS outbreak and COVID-19 pandemic, effective protective measures were the most popular coping mechanism among Taiwanese nurses and Chinese health care professionals[32]. While it may be difficult to spend time with family when social separation is recommended, HCWs can be encouraged to maintain social interactions using alternate digital means such as video call and social networks. These measures are also in line with the World Health Organization’s recommendations on mental health and psychological issues among HCWs during COVID-19 outbreak[33,34].
We observed that the studied HCWs had significant correlating belief in the infection control measures that have been mandated and optimized during the COVID-19 pandemic: universal masking and social distancing with their belief in the vaccination as preventive method for the spread of the Omicron variant or other future variants[35,36]. The same correlation was also observed with their belief that vaccines should be mandatory for all eligible adults. Interestingly they still believed that unnecessary international travelling is an effective measure in preventing the COVID-19 variant spread after the wide spread of vaccination and emergence of at least 3 strains one of them with high transmissibility and serious clinical morbidity and high mortality (Delta variant).
HCWs who believed that COVID-19 mutations are expected and will reoccur were significantly less in agreement of the vaccine ineffectiveness against the spread of the Omicron variant or other potential future ones, that’s an expected healthy behavior by them as the best current preventive measure to contain the pandemic is the widespread vaccination, this has been also observed in their stringent healthy behavior of abiding with the infection prevention measures as universal masking and social distancing for the same purpose[35,36]. Therefore, intuitively the HCWs who strongly believed that COVID-19 vaccination should be mandatory for all adults were strongly against the idea of vaccine ineffectiveness against mutant strains.
HCWs in critical care areas believed significantly in the ineffectiveness of the vaccines to prevent the spread of mutant strains including Omicron. This could be explained by the fact that frontline HCWs might be affected by PTSD, or as being skilled HCWs and their skeptical approach to vaccination and its long-term side effects, that makes it challenging for them to accept the booster doses easily[37].
Male gender was significantly associated with agreement of mandatory vaccination of all eligible adults compared to females. This attitude has been observed in multiple studies as males were more inclined for vaccine uptake and had much less vaccine hesitancy, while age didn’t correlate with mandatory vaccination tendency at all[17,38]. The HCWs who relied on social media as source of information were significantly in agreement with mandatory vaccination for all adults. HCWs self-rated familiarity level with Omicron mutant also played a significant role in directing them toward preference of mandatory vaccination, mostly due to their perception of the potential consequences of the emergence of a new mutant strain and their belief in the role of widespread vaccination to prevent the emergence of further new ones and to contain the current ones.
Agreement level with effectiveness of vaccines to prevent mutant spread was significantly associated with the agreement of mandatory vaccination, the same was observed with agreement level of possible second national lockdown due Omicron mutant, again that behavior from HCWs of stringent abidance with vaccination correlate with their expectation of its effectiveness to prevent the spread of any mutant strain, and their fear of national lockdown isn’t unexpected to drive them to have undoubtful belief in mandatory vaccination as the best modality for that. While they didn’t perceive the effectiveness of unnecessary travel avoidance to be effective to prevent the spread of mutant strains or being superior to mandatory vaccination.
4.2 Study limitations and strengths (Hani)
While this research is subject to the limitation of cross-sectional studies, such as sampling, response, and recall biases, still, this study is among the first to explore perceptions and worries among HCWs considering the new SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. As with the evolving variants situations, HCWs’ experiences and perceptions are likely to change. Moreover, HCWs’ experiences may differ from one setting to another.
5 Conclusion
In this first national survey in Saudi Arabia addressing both the Omicron variant perception and vaccine booster dose acceptance among HCWs, only about two-thirds of HCWs perceived that vaccination is the best option to prevent the spread of the Omicron variant, indicating the need to boost awareness campaigns for the vaccination and booster doses education among HCWs. It is also important to further study and enhance coping strategies for HCWs as we move through the third year of the pandemic with more potential variants, in order to protect HCWs from fatigue and burnout.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Acknowledgments
This research has been financially supported by Prince Abdullah Ben Khalid Celiac Disease Research Chair, under the Vice Deanship of Research Chairs, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The research team is thankful for the statistical data analysis consultation offered by www.hodhodata.com.
Footnotes
Author emails Fadi Aljamaan: PO BOX 2925, Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia faljamaan{at}ksu.edu.sa
Shuliweeh Alenezi: PO BOX 7747, Riyadh, 13321 salenizi{at}ksu.edu.sa
Khalid Alhasan: PO BOX 2925, Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia kalhasan{at}ksu.edu.sa
Abdulkarim Alrabiaah alrabiaah{at}KSU.EDU.SA
Rasha Assiri raassiri{at}pnu.edu.sa
Rolan Bassrawi rkbassrawi{at}ksu.edu.sa,
Ali Alhaboob (AAH): PO BOX 2925, Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia drhbooob{at}gmail.com
Fatimah Alshahrani : Falshahrani1{at}ksu.edu.sa
Mohamad Alarabi : PO BOX 2925, Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia malarabi{at}ksu.edu.sa
Ali Alaraj (AAA): PO BOX 12471, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia al_araj{at}hotmail.com
Naser S Alharbi nsalharbi{at}ksu.edu.sa
Rabih Halwani: rhalwani{at}sharjah.ac.ae
Amr Jamal amrjamal{at}ksu.edu.sa
Ayman AL-Eyadhy aleyadhy{at}ksu.edu.sa
Naif Abdulmajeed Dr.naifq{at}gmail.com
Lina Alfarra Lalfarra19811{at}gmail.com
Wafa almashdali Almashdali{at}gmail.com
Fahad Al-Zamil fzamil{at}KSU.EDU.SA
Mazin Barry mbarry{at}ksu.edu.sa
Ziad Memish zmemish{at}yahoo.com
Jaffar A. Al-Tawfiq jaltawfi{at}yahoo.com
Sarah Al-Subaie salsubaie{at}ksu.edu.sa
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was approved by the institutional review board of King Saud University (approval 21/01039/IRB).
Abbreviations
- CDC
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- COVID-19
- Coronavirus disease 2019
- SARS-CoV-2
- Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
- WHO
- World Health Organization