Abstract
Background Regarding SARS-CoV-2 it is well known that a substantial percentage of adult population cannot get infected if exposed to this novel coronavirus. Several studies give primary indication of the possible role of preexisting immunity whether cross immunity or not. Possible role of latent TB and BCG and malaria have been already suggested to create innate cross heterogeneous immunity. We look for influence of these factors on Covid-19 mortality in malarious countries.
Material and methods 80 malarious countries are enrolled in this study. Hierarchical multiple regression type of analyses is used for data analyses. TB prevalence/ 100,000 population standardized to BCG coverage rates is taken as direct factor in the test. Malaria incidence /1000 population is considered as intermediate factor and the outcome is COVID-19 mortality/ 1 million (M) population.
Results TB prevalence is associated with reduced COVID-19 mortality and malaria have an additional effect in reducing COVID-19 mortality. The results show with robust statistical support that TB prevalence was also associated with reduced COVID-19 mortality with additional effect that is also observed in TB and BCG coverage rate.
Conclusions Malaria and standardized TB prevalence are statistical significant factors predicting COVID-19 mortality in negative associations.
Introduction
Microorganisms infecting mammalian hosts may modulate long lasting protective heterologous cross-immunological reactions once exposed to heterologous agonists in the future 1,2,3. In 2011, Netea et al proposed the term “trained immunity” to describe this ability of innate immune cells to nonspecifically adapting, protecting and remembering primary stimulation4.
BCG
BCG through attenuated strain of Mycobacterium bovis was used to produce heterogeneous immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis which is another species within the genus Mycobacterium. BCG was blamed to lead to incomplete and often varying degree of protection against TB disease5. On the other hand, studies have been done over the past few decades show that certain adaptations connected with innate immune cells (monocyte/macrophages, NK (Natural Killer) cells are responsible for nonspecific effects of vaccination beyond its target 6,7.These studies show that Vaccination with BCG induces an improved innate immune response against microorganisms other than Mycobacterium,which include bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, fungi such as Candida albicans and viruses such as the yellow fever virus6,8,9.
The role of BCG in reduction of neonatal sepsis and respiratory infection reduction10,11,12. Its role in childhood mortality reduction is known since 192713,14,15. Furthermore BCG-vaccination was associated with diminished morbidity and mortality rates associated with malaria, unclassified fever, preventing, sepsis and leprosy 10,11,13,16,17,18. In spite of that many countries discontinue BCG vaccinations or limited its use to high risk groups because great achievements in reduction of TB prevalence rates.
TB
Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the major causes of illness and death in many countries and a significant public health problem worldwide. TB disease is one of the top 10 causes of death accounted to estimated 10 million people in 201819.About one-quarter of the world's population has latent TB20 which leads 5–15% lifetime risk of falling ill with TB19.
Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is the persistence of an immunological response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen stimulation without any clinically active disease21. The lifetime risk of reactivation of TB is estimated to be around 5–10%22.
The WHO recommends tailored latent tuberculosis infection management based on tuberculosis burden and resource availability23. Treatment of active disease is by far the major intervention in this regard worldwide, while diagnosis and treatment of LTBI are hindered by the cost implications of testing, lack of a consensus on the tests recommended, and side effects of treatment24.
Beneficial effects Treatment of LTBI in low prevalence (high to upper-middle-income) countries like USA25and many Europian countries26is feasible (in spite of prolonged adaptive immunological response to Mycobacterium antigen), as elimination of this reservoir of infection will reduce the burden of the disease. However, the scenario in high prevalence countries like many countries in Asia and Africa is quite the opposite where, reinfection due to contact with active cases rather than reactivation contributes to a high disease burden24. In May 5, 2020 latent TB infections was suggested to create heterogenous immune response to COX-COV2 viral infection in different patterns and severity according to different BCG status 27 further studies consolidate such latent TB role 28,29,30.
Malaria
Malaria infection can be asymptomatic, or, more accurately, “subclinical,” because subtle symptoms and chronic health effects may occur but not lead to clinical diagnosis and treatment31. In similar way for TB control malaria elimination require (eradicating both clinically symptomatic as well as these “silent” infections32 which may serve as a reservoir and contribute to ongoing malaria transmission in the face of interventions targeting clinically apparent infections33,34. Malarial infection cross protection for other microorganisms is well known for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The prevalence of malaria/TB coinfection is low35. Murine models suggested protective humoral and cellular immune responses against the complications of each disease]36,37. Further studies suggest increased production of gamma interferon (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and humoral factors induced by tuberculosis infection that are protective against malaria infection36,37,38.
Malaria was also founded to clear S. pneumonia much more efficiently in co-infected model39. Furthermore, having malaria infection was associated with a reduced likelihood of influenza virus and vice versa40,41. It was also suggested that measles infection repressed parasitemia in addition to influenza A infection42. Heterogenous immunological response also exists among different malaria species.
In Italy it has been thought that blacks are less affected by COVID-19 and due to suggested previous exposure to malaria and presence of anti-Glycosylphosphatidylinositol antibodies (which have possible protective effect against malaria re-infection43) might give cross protection against COX-COV2 infection44. Furthermore epidemiological paradox between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and malaria endemicity was noticed in the initial phase of the pandemic45.
High endemicity of TB and Malaria, and universal BCG programs was suggested to have a cushioning effect on proportion of affected population by COVID-19 by ecological study which shows high endemicity of TB, Malaria, and universal BCG programs may have a cushioning effect on proportion of affected population by COVID-1930.
AS far as SARS-CoV-2 is known that a substantial percentage of adult population cannot get infected if exposed to this novel coronavirus46. Several studies suggest a possible role of preexisting immunity whether cross immunity or not (antibodies/T cells, etc.) as a factor explaining such diversity46.
Both of BCG implementation and Latent TB prevalence later on did not fully explain variances in COVID-19 mortalities across different countries. In South Africa for example, where COVID-19 mortality/M population is 238 / M at the study time, while TB prevalence/1000 population is 520/ 100,00 population which is very high. Another examples, these studies do not explain low COVID-19 mortality in countries which have relatively low TB prevalence/ 100,000 population as in: Togo 36, Benin56 and Mali 53 while COVID-19 mortality/ M is 3,3, 6 respectively.
Our study background hypothesis stands on possible heterogeneous immunity generated by malaria in addition to possible heterogeneous immunity generated by TB. This study will test COVID-19 mortality in malarious countries against TB prevalence standardized by BCG coverage and malaria incidence to look for statistical associations and significances. The importance of the study comes from addressing mortalities as far as real number of affected people are beyond counting in view of many factors affecting testing and because of widely distributed asymptomatic persons furthermore this study considers standardized TB prevalence to BCG coverage instead of non-standardized TB prevalence values.
Material and methods
Data used are publically available as follows:
COVID-19 mortality taken on August,31 – September, 1st 2020: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/?
TB prevalence /100,000: world bank site: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.TBS.INCD
Malaria incidence for 2018 /1000: 1- WHO. World Malaria Report 2019 at site: file:///C:/Users/zz/Downloads/9789241565721-eng.pdf
2- World bank site: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.MLR.INCD.P3
3- Max Roser and Hannah Ritchie (2013) - “Malaria”. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from: ‘https://ourworldindata.org/malaria’ [Online Resource]. Publically available at: https://ourworldindata.org/malaria
BCG data: WHO. BCG. Immunization coverage estimates by country publically available at: https://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.80500?lang=en
Data Availability: Datasets generated and/or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Patient and public involvement statement:
It was not appropriate or possible to involve patients or the public in this work given that we used general practice level summated data and related publically published morbidity and mortality statistics. Patients were not involved
We did not include CFR because no. of tests /M vary from to making COVID-19 cases/ 1 M is untrusted indicator. And we took Mortality /M as more trusted one.
All countries and territories under 1 million population are excluded to ovoid correction to 1 million by multiplication of figures these are: Sao Tome and Principe, Guyana, Djibouti, Suriname, Cabo Verde (Cape Verde), Burkina Faso, Belize, Bhutan, Comoros, Mayotte (France), Western Sahara, Vanuatu, Solomon Islands, Sao Tome and Principe.
Total number of malarious countries and territories enrolled in this study is 80. All of these countries have current BCG vaccination programs but differ vaccination coverage.
Countries with Zero malaria incidence are included as far as not yet get the malaria elimination certificate by WHO (Certification of malaria elimination is the official recognition by WHO of a country’s malaria-free status. WHO grants this certification when a country has proven, beyond reasonable doubt, that the chain of local transmission of all human malaria parasites has been interrupted nationwide for at least the past 3 consecutive years, and that a fully functional surveillance and response system that can prevent re-establishment of indigenous transmission is in place).47
The Statistical Hypothesis:
No significant effect due to standardized values of “TB/100000 by BCG Vaccination Coverage 2018 percent” on the Covid-19 Death /1 M. rates as a function factor with the presence of effectiveness an intermediate factor “Malaria incidence for 2018/1000” at the significance level greater than 0.05.
Results and Findings
Hierarchical regression of composite -multiple linear model, is used for data analyses.
The direct factor of reducing the mortality rates with reference to covid-19 is the standardized TB/100,000 population by BCG vaccination coverage percentage in 2018 through dividing the factor of TB prevalence /100,000 population rates by the factor of BCG vaccination coverage in 2018, while the indirect effect that reduce the mortality rates, named as intermediate factor which is “The malaria incidence for 2018/1000 population”.
We investigate the validity of the assumptions of studied model that adopts the results of quantitative measurements. Table No. (1) shows the results of the multiple linear model fitness test resulted from the regression analysis of variance.
The effectiveness of quality of model fitness is observed in the presence of the intermediate factor, the level of significance is greatly reduced compared to the case of the model quality in the absence of the intermediate factor.
On other hand, table No. (2) shows the results of estimating some descriptive statistics accompanying the analysis of the composite linear model.
The level of increase in the value of the multiple correlation coefficient is evidenced by the presence of the intermediate factor in the composite regression analysis.
Table No. (3) includes the results of estimating parameters of the regression and composite regression models in the presence of the indirect effect of the intermediate factor.
In table (3) regarding the model of regression factor estimate (i.e. the standardized TB/100,000 by BCG vaccination coverage 2018), the table shows meaningful linear regression tested in two tailed alternative statistical hypothesis of studied factor playing effective role for reducing “COVID-19 death /1 M. population” as a function of the previous factor. Slope value estimated indicates that with increasing one unit of the studied factor, a negative influence on unit of the rates function factor occurred, and estimated as (−22.11). This decrement recorded significant influence at P<0.05. Other sources of variations are not included in model, i.e. “Constant term in regression equation” shows that non assignable factors which are not included in regression equation, ought to be informative, since estimation about (127) cases of “COVID-19 Mortality / 1 M.” expected initially without effectiveness of the restriction of studied factor.
Back to the results of the table No. (3), and regarding to composite regression estimate's factors (i.e. the standardized TB/100000 by BCG vaccination coverage 2018 as direct effect, and malaria incidence for 2018/1000 population as indirect effect) results shows a meaningful composite linear regression tested in two tailed alternative statistical hypothesis of studied factor is playing effective role for reducing “Covid-19 death /1 M.” rates as a function of the previous factors. Slope value concerning the that the first factor's estimate indicates that with increasing one unit of the studied first factor, a negative influence on unit of the rates function factor would occur, and estimated as (−18.00). The decrement recorded significant influence at P<0.05, while with presence of indirect effect by the second factor, slope value indicates that with increasing one unit of that factor, a negative influence on unit of the rates function factor would occur, and estimated as (−0.331). The decrement recorded has highly significant influence at P<0.01. Ohers source of variations are not included in composite regression model, i.e. “Constant term” ought to be informative, since estimated that about (152) cases of “Covid-19 Mortality / 1 M.” expected initially without effectiveness of the restriction of studied factors.
Discussion
In this study the prevalence of mycobacterium spp. (including BCG vaccine) exposure of the populations is negatively associated with COVID-19 deaths per million populations this supports the previous mentioned studies27,28,29,30.
TB prevalence standardization for BCG coverage is very important factor regarding studying countries currently implementing BCG programs as far as coverage is important factor in such studies reflecting the degree of benefits added to the factor (latent TB prevalence) the coverage do and that’s what we do in this study. Likewise the influence of time duration of cessation of BCG vaccination program is a factor in determining COVID-19 mortality48 in countries ceased implementing this vaccine and that’s what we did in our previous study.
Malaria which can induce immunological response as was suggested in one way or another is significantly associated with reduction in COVID-19 mortality. This association needs confirmatory immunological and clinical control studies to establish causation. This finding can explain the variances in COVID-19 mortality among different countries much deeper than TB and BCG alone. BCG vaccination status for countries being of concern earlier before latent TB becomes of more concern but previous early studies were conflicting and were criticized because of possible confounding factors. In our study her all countries are implementing national BCG programs but TB countries’ prevalence /100,00 population were standardized by BCG coverage rates and shows significant association with reduction of COVID-19 mortality.
Data Availability
Data are publicly available. links to publicly accessed data are included within the manuscript
Recommendations
Malaria, TB prevalence and BCG coverage rates are possible factors in COVID-19 mortality.
Ethics and dissemination
Ethical permission is not necessary as this study analyzed publically published data and patients were not involved.
There is no conflict of interest.
Funding
No specific source of funding was utilized for the current study.
Acknowledgment
I am deeply grateful to Emeritus Professor Abdulkhaleq Abduljabbar Ali Ghalib Al-Naqeeb, Ph.D. in the Philosophy of Statistical Sciences at the Medical & Health Technology college, Baghdad-Iraq, for his assistance and support in data analysis, interpretations of finding results, and revision and displaying the paper.