Abstract
IMPORTANCE The predictive value of common performance-based outcome assessments of mobility capacity on incident disability in activities of daily living in community-dwelling older adults remains uncertain.
OBJECTIVE To synthesize all available research on the association between mobility capacity and incident disability in non-disabled older adults.
DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases were searched without any limits or restrictions.
STUDY SELECTION Published reports of longitudinal cohort studies that estimated a direct association between baseline mobility capacity, assessed with a standardized outcome assessment, and subsequent development of disability, including initially non-disabled older adults.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data extraction was completed by independent pairs of reviewers. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Random-effect models were used to explore the objective. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.
MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES The main outcome measures were the pooled relative risks (RR) per one conventional unit per mobility assessment for incident disability in activities of daily living.
RESULTS A total of 40 reports were included, evaluating 85,515 and 78,379 participants at baseline and follow-up, respectively (median mean age: 74.6 years). The median disability rate at follow-up was 12.0% (IQR: 5.4%–23.3%). The overall risk of bias was judged as low, moderate and high in 6 (15%), 6 (15%), and 28 (70%) reports, respectively.
For usual and fast gait speed, the RR per -0.1 m/s was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.18–1.28; 26,638 participants) and 1.28 (95% CI: 1.19–1.38; 8,161 participants), respectively. Each point decrease in Short Physical Performance Battery score increased the risk of incident disability by 30% (RR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.23– 1.38; 9,183 participants). The RR of incident disability by each second increase in Timed Up and Go test and Chair Rise Test performance was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.09–1.21; 30,426 participants) and 1.07 (95% CI: 1.04–1.10; 9,450 participants), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among community-dwelling non-disabled older adults, a poor mobility capacity is a potent modifiable risk factor for incident disability. Mobility impairment should be mandated as a quality indicator of health for older people.
QUESTION What are the associations between clinical outcome assessments of mobility capacity and incident disability in community-dwelling older adults?
FINDINGS In this systematic review and meta-analysis that included 40 reports and data of 85,515 older adults, the risk ratios of incident disability on activities of daily living were 1.23, 1.30, 1.15, and 1.07 for usual gait speed, Short Physical Performance Battery, Timed Up and Go test, and Chair Rise Test, respectively, per one conventional unit.
MEANING Common assessments of mobility capacity may help identify older people at risk of incident disability and should be routinely established in regular health examinations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the "Wilhelm-Stiftung fuer Rehabilitationsforschung", Essen, Germany. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.