ABSTRACT
Objective Reactive balance training is an emerging approach to reduce falls risk in people with balance impairments. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of reactive balance training on falls in daily life among individuals at increased risk of falls, and to document associated adverse events.
Data sources Databases searched were Ovid MEDLINE (1946-November 2020), Embase Classic and Embase (1947-November 2020), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2014-November 2020), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro; searched on 9 November 2020).
Study selection Randomized controlled trials of reactive balance training were included. The literature search was limited to English language. Records were screened by two investigators separately.
Data extraction Outcome measures were number of participants who reported falls after training, number of falls reported after training, and the nature, frequency, and severity of adverse events. Authors of included studies were contacted to obtain additional information.
Data synthesis Twenty-five trials were included, of which 14 reported falls and 19 monitored adverse events. Participants assigned to reactive balance training groups were less likely to fall compared to control groups (fall risk ratio: 0.75, 95% confidence interval=[0.60, 0.92]; p=0.006, I2=37%) and reported fewer falls than control groups (rate ratio: 0.60, 95% confidence interval=[0.42, 0.86]; p=0.005, I2=83%). Prevalence of adverse events was higher in reactive balance training (29%) compared to control groups (19%; p=0.018).
Conclusion RBT reduces the likelihood of falls in daily life for older adults and people with balance impairments. More adverse events were reported for reactive balance training than control groups.
Impact Balance training that evokes balance reactions can reduce falls among people at increased risk of falls.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have created a reactive balance training toolkit, which is partially monetized.
Funding Statement
Avril Mansfield was supported by a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflicts of interests: The authors have created a reactive balance training toolkit, which is partially monetized.
A study that was included in the meta-analysis was accidentally omitted from Table 1 in version 1. This study has now been included in Table 1.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
