Abstract
The performances of current medical text summarization systems rely on resource-heavy domain-specific knowledge sources, and preprocessing methods (e.g., classification or deep learning) for deriving semantic information. Consequently, these systems are often difficult to customize, extend or deploy in low-resource settings, and are operationally slow. We propose a fast summarization system that can aid practitioners at point-of-care, and, thus, improve evidence-based healthcare. At runtime, our system utilizes similarity measurements derived from pre-trained domain-specific word embeddings in addition to simple features, rather than clunky knowledge bases and resource-heavy preprocessing. Automatic evaluation on a public dataset for evidence-based medicine shows that our system’s performance, despite the simple implementation, is statistically comparable with the state-of-the-art.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Support for the authors was provided by Emory University.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Non-human subjects research
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
