RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The potential impact of removing a ban on electronic nicotine delivery systems using the Mexico smoking and vaping model (SAVM)
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.04.28.24306511
DO 10.1101/2024.04.28.24306511
A1 Sánchez-Romero, Luz María
A1 Li, Yameng
A1 Zavala-Arciniega, Luis
A1 Gallegos-Carrillo, Katia
A1 Thrasher, James F.
A1 Meza, Rafael
A1 Levy, David T.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/30/2024.04.28.24306511.abstract
AB Objective To develop the Mexico Smoking and Vaping Model (Mexico SAVM) to estimate cigarette and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) prevalence and the public health impact of legalizing ENDS use.Methods SAVM, a cohort-based discrete-time simulation model, compares two scenarios. The ENDS-Restricted Scenario estimates smoking prevalence and associated mortality outcomes under the current policy of an ENDS ban, using Mexico-specific population projections, death rates, life expectancy, and smoking and e-cigarette prevalence. The ENDS-Unrestricted Scenario projects smoking and vaping prevalence under a hypothetical scenario where ENDS use is allowed. The impact of legalizing ENDS use is estimated as the difference in smoking- and vaping-attributable deaths (SVADs) and life-years lost (LYLs) between the ENDS-Restricted and Unrestricted scenarios.Results Compared to a national ENDS ban, The Mexico SAVM projects that legalizing ENDS use could decrease smoking prevalence by 40.1% in males and 30.9% in females by 2049 compared to continuing the national ENDS ban. This reduction in prevalence would save 2.9 (2.5 males and 0.4 females) million life-years and avert almost 106 (91.0 males and 15.5 females) thousand deaths between 2025 and 2049. Public health gains decline by 43% to 59,748 SVADs averted when the switching rate is reduced by half and by 24.3% (92,806 SVADs averted) with a 25% ENDS risk level from that of cigarettes but increased by 24.3% (121,375 SVADs averted) with the 5% ENDS risk.Conclusions Mexico SAVM suggests that greater access to ENDS and a more permissive ENDS regulation, simultaneous with strong cigarette policies, would reduce smoking prevalence and decrease smoking-related mortality. The unanticipated effects of an ENDS ban merit closer scrutiny, with further consideration of how specific ENDS restrictions may maximize public health benefits.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementYesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:ExemptionI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData used to parameterize the model are publicly available https://ensanut.insp.mx/ https://www.gob.mx/conapo/documentos/catalogo-digital-direccion-de-analisis-estadistico-e-informatica?idiom=es The SAVM package and User Guide are made available to the public by the University of Michigan and Georgetown University-Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS)-Center for the Assessment of Tobacco Regulation (CAsToR) group upon request at: https://tcors.umich.edu/Resources_Download.php?FileType=SAV_Model https://www.gob.mx/conapo/documentos/catalogo-digital-direccion-de-analisis-estadistico-e-informatica?idiom=es https://ensanut.insp.mx/ https://tcors.umich.edu/Resources_Download.php?FileType=SAV_Model